SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (16085)1/14/1998 2:39:00 PM
From: Harvey Allen  Respond to of 24154
 
MS asked to define "remove"

news.com



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (16085)1/14/1998 7:30:00 PM
From: mike iles  Respond to of 24154
 
Daniel,

Steve Ballmer (hey, it's an attitude):

"There might be ways of being more benevolent." (re MSFT's PR blunders)

regards, Mike



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (16085)1/14/1998 7:37:00 PM
From: Keith Hankin  Respond to of 24154
 
OK, Dan. Here's one you'll love:
Judge miffed at Microsoft on OS
news.com
The first line: How do you define "remove"?



To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (16085)1/14/1998 8:56:00 PM
From: Schiz  Respond to of 24154
 
Ralph Nader and a few other people were on cnn last night. I just caught the last few minutes. It seemed like Ralph was the only one saying anything bad about ms. There was a guy that said he used to work for Lotus, who had 90%? of the spreadsheet market and ms came out with excel, a far superior product and quickly destroyed Lotus. Do you think he actually beleives that? I wish I could have seen the whole show.

"I'd be very surprised if the court awarded any contempt fine," says San Francisco intellectual-property attorney Lawrence J. Siskind, who is not involved in the case. Siskind reasons that, because the over-arching dispute is eons from resolution, imposing a monetary punishment now places the court at risk of having to eat crow at a later date. Should Microsoft eventually win, as Siskind expects it will, the court would have to refund any fines.

Is this true?

The fine really doesn't matter, what is going from 10% to 40% market share worth?

What other files should Microsoft give OEMs the option to remove?" asked Holley. "I don't feel comfortable saying," replied Weadock. "I couldn't draw a box around the files that constitute IE."

Holley continued his questioning on what specific files Weadock thinks make up Internet Explorer, to no avail. "I can't cite specific C code or give you a list of files that make up IE. Some are shared," said Weadock.

Judge Jackson eventually interjected Holley's questioning, saying "the witness has said several times that he cannot do that [say where IE ends and Windows 95 begins], and I think you have tested the limits."


This seems to be a big point to me. ms seems to think that ie must be removed by deleting entire files and not by editing the ie code out of the files that it is in. Was this in the judges ruling?