Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (79067)	6/22/2018 10:40:49 PM
From: Katelew	1 Recommendation Recommended By robert a belfer Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 364685

First of all, e-verify is being enforced and increasing under Trump. It takes more ICE to do more enforcement. Secondly, there's the problem of illegals getting false documents that are very good in quality. This is what an employer has when he makes a hire, and it takes skilled ICE personnel to evaluate them. So this gives the employer who wants the cheap labor an out, don't you see. If a worker presents false documents to an employer, then what can the employer do? If an employer simply refuses to hire any Mexicans, he could face the ACLU. As for after WW1, you're talking about legal immigration. The govt. set the quotas from each country and set the overall limits, just as we do today. That's why it's important to distinguish between legal and illegal immigration. Most of the libs on this thread are trying support illegal immigration by bringing up examples of legal immigration. <<We can't have a government of the ICE like vigilantes that go around demanding ID - Gawd! How unAmerican of a road do you want us to go down? One good case before the SC likely will stop that. .............>> Uhhhh, would mind explaining this? ICE agents are government agents not vigilante groups. Their job is to enforce immigration law and asking for ID documents is the only way to find out who is in the country illegally. This is the government approach we already have. What makes this un-American and something the SC would stop? Maybe you're confused. How else can immigration law be enforced? I'm off for the rest of the weekend and maybe beyond. Bye guys.