SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: arno who wrote (79843)6/26/2018 10:58:33 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 358364
 
It is not a Muslim ban...it is a travel ban

Semantics. The only thing those countries have in common is that they are predominantly Muslim.

“The Supreme Court has upheld the clear authority of the president to defend the national security of the United States,”

To defend national security, there has to be an actual threat, not fantasies. None of the people from the countries in question have posed an actual threat. Those who may have articulated any kind of threat, are banned anyway. We routinely let people from Saudi Arabia in the country, despite the fact that 9/11 was mainly perpetrated by citizens of that country.

The lie of that court decree is that the original order asked for 120 days to put procedures in place to deal with the imaginary threat. That 120 days expired more than a year ago. Procedures could be put in place without a ban, the supposed rationale was that people from those countries posed such a risk that they had to be banned or awful things would happen. Note that citizens of those countries still haven't done awful things in this country despite the stay of execution.

So, what are the measures? It has been over 500 days since the emergency was called. What is taking so long?



To: arno who wrote (79843)6/26/2018 11:34:59 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 358364
 
Nobody really cares. The countries he banned have never attacked us, but they don't have any Trump businesses either. I'm glad it makes you happy!




To: arno who wrote (79843)6/27/2018 12:54:51 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 358364
 
That is a lie arno and beneath you to repeat it. Everyone knows that the intent was a Muslim ban because Trump said it over and over.

He couched it in terms of countries and national security so that the courts would OK it, after deciding against him in the beginning, but that was not his INTENT.

You do not serve yourself or the nation well when you repeat a lie!

<<t is not a Muslim ban...it is a travel ban