Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus who wrote (60938)	6/28/2018 6:01:06 PM
From: Paul Senior	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78777

Could you imagine a time when Ben Graham might say a stock growing at 30% a year with a market multiple of say 21, might be a buy for the enterprising investor? Or a stock almost unanalyzable but growing and decimating the retail landscape could be a buy? Perhaphs it's possible he might say that in these investing times, and given the kind of sad state of classic value investing opportunities, they might be buys, but risky, and/or only within a diversified portfolio of other stocks. Could you imagine Dr. Graham saying though that he's buying a stock because it might bounce off its moving average, and if it doesn't then he could see the stock falling to some specific lower number? I cannot believe that he would ever be buying stocks in this way. So I'm saying again, please stop posting technical analysis opinions and conclusions of specific stocks on this, a presumably Ben Graham type SubjectMark.