Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (142463)	7/1/2018 5:12:15 AM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Recommended By dvdw© James Seagrove Respond to of 218449

The climate models have already been invalidated because all the models had temperature rising faster than reality actually did. It didn't take millennia. It was not even a decade before the models were going awry. After 2 decades they have become a joke. The so-called scientists have been fighting a rear-guard action by retroactively changing their falsifiability by saying the heat sneaked away hid in the ocean where it can't be measured, rather than being in the troposphere where a hot spot altitude was supposed to be the defining proof. Ooops a daisy. Settled Science got unsettled and became a "travesty" to quote Keith Briffa of the Tree Ring Circus. The graphs reminded me of the oil price predictions of the NZ government decades ago after the 1979 price quadrupling. Their price prediction graph had a band in which the price was supposed to go. But the actual oil price popped straight out the bottom of the range and then declined to $10 a barrel in 1986. Hilarious. Mqurice