Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: s martin who wrote (36741)	1/14/1998 4:07:00 PM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Doug54, It seems I was right, If you can't see the sick, intimidating minds at work in Tonto's post, Maybe you should do some more DD, Pugs54

To: s martin who wrote (36741)	1/14/1998 4:09:00 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

I haven't seen anyone get outraged about his attack on you. Consider me outraged, yet amused. In retrospect, Pugs apologized for being wrong; not for his actions. I believe that "apology" was motivated by people on his side of the fence pointing out how he was appearing to "nays" and "yays" alike. The amusing part is that once he got that out of the way, he immediately went back to the same activities, and worse. What's not amusing is that he has taken a disagreement that was confined to this thread, and turned it into very real attacks in real life.

To: s martin who wrote (36741)	1/14/1998 4:20:00 PM
From: Ellen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

<only trying to stir up old trouble>

To: s martin who wrote (36741)	1/14/1998 6:18:00 PM
From: FTJoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Sorry if this isn't outraged enough, was spending more time opposing the suit against Michael: To: +Pugs (34707 ) From: +FTJoe Thursday, Jan 8 1998 9:28AM EST Reply # of 36803 Hey Pugs, you can slam me for this if you want, but what more do you want from tonto? He's basically stated he's not going to comment about the actions of folks on either side, and he doesn't know where the stock will trade. His opinion is the SEC does not decide where it trades, do you really think he's lying, or maybe misinformed? I, of course have no idea who is right, so that's how much this post is worth. I am, as always, confused. ;-) To: +Pugs (34716 ) From: +FTJoe Thursday, Jan 8 1998 10:01AM EST Reply # of 36804 I hear what you're saying Pugs, I just don't see it. He said he's not sure where it's going to trade. As far as him saying the company is lying, that's his take on what, at best, can be described as incorrect information posted by the company in their past filings. That is, after all, what the recent 8K corrected. Again, he stated he doesn't wish to engage in personal attacks on either side, and I am frankly amazed he hasn't so far. I'm sure he has somewhat strong opinions about the quality/accurateness of posts from both sides. That is how I see it, that's all. I really think we are getting nowhere by continuing personal attacks, letters to employers/SEC/NASD, threatened law suits, etc. Obviously it isn't doing much to stop the attacks on us and RMIL, if anything, it's escalated the attacks. I'm afraid it might be turning many folks/lurkers off (just a guess), I know it's not making me very happy about being part of this. I say let them spew and post relevant information only, time will tell who is correct about the issues on trading, the squeeze, the fundis, etc. All this is, of course, my humble and uninformed opinion. I'll let it rest now. To: +Joe Master (35224 ) From: +FTJoe Friday, Jan 9 1998 6:19PM EST Reply # of 36805 I went through the tonto discussion with pugs already, I posted that I couldn't understand why he was jumping on tonto. Posts below, only meaningful section is the plea at the bottom of the second one for everyone to chill out. We agreed to disagree. Sorry for all the editing, It's friday, happy hour started already. (sorry ditch) To: +Pugs (35234 ) From: +FTJoe Friday, Jan 9 1998 6:48PM EST Reply # of 36806 I know where you're coming from, some of us like tonto though. To: +Pugs (36372 ) From: +FTJoe Tuesday, Jan 13 1998 5:18PM EST Reply # of 36807 In my less than learned opinion, I think you're reaching on this one. Proximity of residence hardly makes for a case of nefarious collusion. As always, I am dazed, confused uninformed... The Missing Link.