Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Radica Games (RADA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j rector who wrote (1854)	1/14/1998 4:23:00 PM
From: Hank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7111

For what it's worth, the Vector Vest site now calculates RADAF to be worth $28/share. But they also rate it a sell due to it's recent downward trend. If this is a large short seller, I'd like to know how he's coming up with all these shares to borrow with a company as small as RADAF? The only way that makes sense is if FAHN is shorting naked. I know MM's can do this but not if they are doing it for a client per se or am I missing something? I know I can't always borrow shares on stocks I short. Something seems fishy here. Hank

To: j rector who wrote (1854)	1/14/1998 4:34:00 PM
From: jerald morse	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 7111

Someone posted << I know I'm preaching to the choir, but I'd love to hear some risk factors that we haven't taken into account. This stock appears to be as much of a no brainer as it was last year at $4.>> I feel this way too as do most of the people on this thread - and I've been here a long time, BUT there is something I came across in the 20F that I find disturbing. It may not be a big deal, and it may not be contributing to the selling problem but most of the selling didn't start in earnest until the 20F was filed, if I remember correctly. Basically there are a few paragraphs in question which I will paraphrase. It seems a large Japanese company has either filed against or is in discussions with Radica concerning certain patent infringements. Radica mentions they might have to license these patents from the other company or remove the infringed on parts. Either occurance might impact revenues. It does not state that the company (RADAF) thinks this infringement issue is a bunch of bunk. We don't know what is affected. Hopefully it is small potatoes, but maybe not. We need Davids' help on this if he can comment.