SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (1078784)7/18/2018 6:56:58 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mongo2116

  Respond to of 1583478
 
Republican conservatives = American TRAITORS... has been proven again and again and again....from Reagan creating and funding Bin Laden to the current POS trump traitor mofo....



To: longnshort who wrote (1078784)7/18/2018 7:07:26 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mongo2116

  Respond to of 1583478
 
THE WORLD KNOWS...'Putin's poodle:' Newspapers around the world react to Trump-Putin meeting
By James Masters, CNN
Updated 1:38 PM ET, Tue July 17, 2018
cnn.com

John King: Call this the 'surrender summit'
Brennan on Trump's performance: Treasonous

London (CNN)Newspapers around the world ran different photographs of the same scene on their front pages on Tuesday morning -- US President Donald Trump and Russia's President Vladimir Putin standing side-by-side at a news conference following their two-hour meeting in Helsinki, Finland.

Trump declined to endorse the US government's assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 US presidential election, instead publicly embracing Putin's "extremely strong and powerful" denial.
The morning after in the UK, the Daily Mirror tabloid newspaper ran coverage of the summit on its front page, labeling Trump "Putin's poodle" and quoting former CIA Director and career intelligence officer John Brennan who described the US President's performance as "nothing short of treasonous."

View image on Twitter





Helen Miller@MsHelicat





Tuesday’s MIRROR: Putin’s poodle #tomorrowspaperstoday

2:28 PM - Jul 16, 2018


612


361 people are talking about this


Twitter Ads info and privacy

In Finland, which played host to the summit, newspaper Kauppalehti used a soccer analogy in its headline: "Trump 0-1 Putin," along with a photo of Trump holding a soccer ball given to him by the Russian leader. The summit happened a day after the World Cup -- hosted by Russia -- came to an end.

View image on Twitter





Jake Tapper

?@jaketapper

This morning’s paper here in Finland

7:11 PM - Jul 16, 2018


15.4K


6,496 people are talking about this


Twitter Ads info and privacy

Swedish newspaper HBL went with "Putin: Trump is my favorite" above a photo of the Russian leader smiling.

View image on Twitter





Jake Tapper

?@jaketapper





“Putin: Trump was my favorite”

7:21 PM - Jul 16, 2018


1,459


855 people are talking about this


Twitter Ads info and privacy

In France, Le Monde topped its front page with: "Donald Trump, best of allies with Vladimir Putin."

View image on Twitter





Le Monde

?@lemondefr

#ALaUne Trump, meilleur allié de Poutine | #CM2018 Le triomphal retour des Bleus | Les députés LRM veulent accélérer sur la PMA

Et pour vous abonner t.co

1:38 AM - Jul 17, 2018


44


37 people are talking about this


Twitter Ads info and privacy

In Italy, La Repubblica ran with: "The great Trump-Putin agreement, US intelligence rebels."



In Putin's native Russia, Komsomolskaya Pravda published the headline: "How yesterday's handshake between Putin and Trump differed from last year's."



While the headline on the front of Russia's MK newspaper read: "Trump and Putin exchanged being late." The sub-head added: "And they didn't say anything about the strength of their handshake."



In the US, the New York Post went with a headline of "See No Evil" with "Prez gives big Bear hug to wicked BFF Vlad, jabs US intel," at the top of the page.

View image on Twitter





Nick Bryant@NickBryantNY





Even the New York Post is ripping into Trump for #HELSINKI2018

11:43 PM - Jul 16, 2018


48


29 people are talking about this


Twitter Ads info and privacy

The New York Times devoted much of its front page to the story leading with the headline "Trump, with Putin, attacks 2016 intelligence" above a photograph of the two leaders shaking hands.

View image on Twitter





Chris Donovan

?@chrisdonovan





Tuesday's New York Times: "TRUMP, WITH PUTIN, ATTACKS 2016 INTELLIGENCE"

10:09 PM - Jul 16, 2018


61


65 people are talking about this


Twitter Ads info and privacy

Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch, declared the news conference "a personal and national embarrassment," asserting that Trump had "projected weakness."

View image on Twitter





The Wall Street Journal

?@WSJ





Take an early look at the front page of The Wall Street Journalhttps://t.co/5xQPDPcm8q

9:35 PM - Jul 16, 2018


221


255 people are talking about this



To: longnshort who wrote (1078784)7/18/2018 7:11:19 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mongo2116

  Respond to of 1583478
 
LOSING..Discord over Trump's Helsinki humiliation hands Putin another win
Analysis by Stephen Collinson, CNN
Updated 1:06 AM ET, Wed July 18, 2018
cnn.com

(CNN)Vladimir Putin is winning so much, he's going to get tired of winning.

Two days after President Donald Trump' s humiliation in Helsinki, the election interference operation that keeps on giving -- for Russia -- is sowing new discord and disorientation in American politics and tightening its grip on the White House.

Trump's grudging efforts Tuesday to quell a boiling political crisis over his dismal performance at Monday's summit with the Russian leader only caused more controversy and may not have done much to repair his personal prestige and international reputation.

The still reverberating shock and concern over Trump's conduct promises days more of political discombobulation and recrimination, setting American against American and ultimately weakening the structures of US and Western democracy.

In other words, exactly what Putin wants, and all he had to do was show up to a summit with Trump to give a drama that is having a deeply corrosive effect on his old enemy, the United States, a new lease on life.

By Tuesday, the White House had concluded the President needed to do something to rescue his relationship with the intelligence community and his political credibility after taking Putin's word -- not that of America's spies -- over the issue of election interference.

But the effort may have backfired when he read from a prepared statement in the White House, an appearance that seemed to further mute his trademark bravado after an episode that has sparked more questions than ever about just what the Russians may have on the US President.

On Capitol Hill, the recurring Trump nightmare that afflicts Republicans reappeared as GOP leaders signaled their disgust at the President's behavior, sent their own message to Putin and reassured US allies traumatized by the NATO-skeptic President.

But the fact that most walked up to the line of personally, specifically criticizing Trump but did not cross it even under these extreme circumstances showed that the foundations of his presidency are likely to emerge intact from the new crisis enveloping the White House. Democrats, as usual, raged loudly but impotently at Trump's behavior, though they will hope the dent to the President's image will linger among voters come the midterm elections in November.

Trump fails to satisfy critics -- again
Looking stern, and reading from the prepared text -- to which the familiar words "No collusion" had been added in thick, black ink -- Trump unspooled an improbable excuse for one of his most troublesome comments Monday in Helsinki -- "I don't see any reason why it would be" Russia that was responsible for interfering in the US election.



Trump's written notes spotted on Russia statement 02:51

Trump said that once he had gotten home from Helsinki, watched television and read the transcript of the news conference, he realized the answer needed a clarification.
"It should have been obvious -- I thought it would be obvious -- but I would like to clarify, just in case it wasn't," Trump told reporters.
"The sentence should have been: 'I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be Russia.' ... So you can put that in, and I think that probably clarifies things pretty good by itself."
Except it didn't. The credibility of Trump's do-over was called into question since it came a full 24 hours after the disastrous encounter with Putin. The President could at any time have cleaned his comment up more quickly. And if the new phrase is inserted in Trump's remarks it becomes quite obvious it is out of context and doesn't reflect what he was trying to convey in surrounding sentences.
CNN's Jeff Zeleny reported that the impetus for Trump's statement that he had misspoken in Finland came from the President himself. There was concern among Trump aides that his kowtowing to Putin made him look unpatriotic and that a senior member of the intelligence community, possibly Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, might resign.




Trump caved spectacularly to Putin. Here's what might happen next

Trump also appeared to undercut his own message when he said that while he accepted that Russia had hacked the election, others could have been involved too: "There's a lot of people out there."
The problem here is that the President, far from throwing his weight behind the intelligence community's findings that Russia intervened in the 2016 election, is yet again casting doubt on the authenticity of the assessment. Just as he did in Helsinki.
It is not the first case of Trump trying to clear up a self-created political disaster but digging in deeper. Many commentators have noticed the similarities between this episode and the time last year when the President equivocated on blaming neo-Nazis and white supremacists for violence in Charlottesville, Virginia.
Scott Jennings, who was a special assistant to President George W. Bush, said Trump's insistence on offering caveats to his statement defeated the purpose.
"It would have been better not to have done anything today at all, if you were going to throw that phrase in," Jennings said on CNN's "The Lead with Jake Tapper," describing the Helsinki debacle as a serious mistake and the low point of Trump's presidency.
"Then you try to walk it back, and then the walk-back gets muddled because you didn't get that exactly right, either."
And it is one thing to vow to protect the US electoral system and offer the intelligence community "full faith and support," as Trump did, safe in the White House.
It was the President's failure to do so standing next to Putin -- a US adversary who those same intelligence agencies accuse of interfering in the 2016 election to put him in office -- that caused this controversy. His unwillingness to do so in Helsinki is why critics in Washington saw him as weak -- an adjective that is always damaging to a President, especially when it is manifested during an appearance overseas.
Republicans show (a little) steel
One of the most striking aspects of the Helsinki fallout was the willingness of Republicans on Capitol Hill to at least implicitly criticize Trump --- a step many have been unwilling to take in the past.
The most important Republican in Washington other than the President -- Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, in his understated, courtly way -- made his disapproval of Trump's dismal appearance alongside Putin and his criticism of America's Western allies quite clear.
The Kentucky Republican spoke to America's allies in the way a normal President might, following Trump's insult-a-thon through Europe before he met Putin.
"Let me just say to our European friends, we value the NATO treaty; it's been the most significant military alliance in world history. We believe the European Union countries are our friends, and the Russians are not."
McConnell also delivered the message to Putin that Trump had failed to give.
"I think the Russians need to know that there are a lot of us who fully understand what happened in 2016, and it really better not happen again in 2018," McConnell said.
Given that Congress forced Trump's hand by passing sanctions on Russia to punish 2016 election interference -- that the President had no choice but to implement because of their veto-proof majorities -- McConnell was making no idle threat.
Yet were Republican lawmakers really intent on reining in the President they could do so much more -- including holding hearings on what happened during the one-on-one encounter between Trump and Putin. They could pass resolutions -- even though they would be nonbinding -- to make clear their disapproval of Trump's Russia policy. Congress could also make it harder for Trump to lift existing sanctions on Russia, in a way that could hamper his hopes to engage Putin further. None of that is yet on a fast track.
And the difficulty in building House and Senate majorities behind such steps underscores the political calculation that many Republicans are making.
Every day closer to November's midterms, the President's hold on his party and his high approval ratings among GOP voters become more significant, and may in the end ensure that Trump escapes the Helsinki debacle without political damage -- at least with his own side.



To: longnshort who wrote (1078784)7/18/2018 7:13:57 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mongo2116

  Respond to of 1583478
 
The FACT that lying traitor POS trump keeps saying "there was no collusion", you know there was collusion in a big way. And the Mueller investigation is lining up with all the arrests, indictments and guilty pleas to expose exactly that....



To: longnshort who wrote (1078784)7/18/2018 7:37:11 AM
From: sylvester801 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mongo2116

  Respond to of 1583478
 
Lying liar TRAITOR POS trump, facing fury, says he misspoke with Putin
By Kevin Liptak and Jeff Zeleny, CNN
Updated 5:17 AM ET, Wed July 18, 2018
cnn.com
Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump, facing an onslaught of bipartisan fury over his glowing remarks about Vladimir Putin, said more than 24 hours afterward that he had misspoken during his news conference with the autocratic Russian leader.

In one of the only times of his presidency he's admitted to a mistake, Trump said that when he returned Monday from the summit with Putin in Helsinki, Finland, he "realized there is some need for clarification" about his remarks on Russian interference in the 2016 US election.
"In a key sentence in my remarks I said the word 'would' instead of 'wouldn't,' " the President said Tuesday. He explained he had reviewed a transcript and video of his remarks.
"The sentence should have been: 'I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be Russia,' " he said. "Sort of a double negative."

During Monday's news conference, Trump said, "I don't see any reason why it would be" Russia that interfered in the election.




Discord over Trump's Helsinki humiliation hands Putin another win

including insights and must-reads of world news

The admission came in the White House Cabinet Room, where Trump was sitting with lawmakers for an otherwise unrelated meeting. Reading prepared remarks to reporters, the President reiterated that there had been no collusion between his campaign and Russia and that the country's efforts had no impact on the final election results.
And he voiced support for US intelligence agencies -- a day after he had refused to accept their findings on Russia's election interference over Putin's denials -- and vowed to take action to prevent further attacks.
"I accept our intelligence community's conclusion that Russia's meddling in the 2016 election took place," Trump said. But diverting from his typewritten notes, the President added: "It could be other people also. A lot of people out there."
It was an attempt at clarification that came after uproarious anger at Trump's performance in Helsinki. Even many members of the President's own party rebuked his statements from nearly the moment he departed the Finnish capital. Yet it took more than a day for him or the White House to offer any official walk-back.
A scramble had ensued in the West Wing after Trump's remarks Monday. It was the President himself who determined in a meeting that he wanted to say he had misspoken, according to officials familiar with the matter, who said Trump led the crafting of the clarification that unfolded Tuesday afternoon.
The officials said it became clear early Tuesday that initial discussions of clarifying his remarks on Twitter would not prove sufficient, as Trump was hearing from more and more people through phone calls and messages that he had to say something.
The President spoke to key lawmakers and outside confidants leading up to his remarks, people familiar with the matter said. One driving factor in the clarification, the officials said, was a fear of resignations in the intelligence community -- possibly Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats or others — and a sense that Trump's Monday news conference "looked unpatriotic."




US offers no details as Russia claims Trump and Putin reached military agreements

Vice President Mike Pence -- who a day earlier had praised Trump's performance in Helsinki -- was closely involved in fielding outside criticism and trying to keep Republican members of Congress measured in their responses, an official said.
Top national security officials -- including Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and national security adviser John Bolton -- huddled in the Oval Office Tuesday to develop a response to the fallout. Chief of staff John Kelly and adviser Stephen Miller were also involved in that conversation. Officials held multiple other meetings in the West Wing throughout the day, but not all involved the President.
Those officials, led by Pence and Pompeo, helped sway the President to make his statement.
Trump still believes the criticism is being blown out of proportion, one official said, and he plans to try to turn the attacks onto the press once again.
But his attempt at cleanup fell flat to some in the West Wing. Bringing up "no collusion" and saying there "could be other people also" responsible for election interference in addition to Russia is viewed as another mistake, the official said.
"He is consumed with talk of no collusion," another official said, saying Trump had repeated it all day and "thinks it's the answer to everything."
Indeed, when the President was presented with a typewritten script to read before reporters on Tuesday, he made some of his own additions: Scrawled in black marker were the words "THERE WAS NO COLUSION" -- with the final word missing an L.
As Trump read his statement, aides in the back of the room read along, following the President's words on their own copies of his script. The appearance was not without farce. As Trump was declaring his "full faith and support" for US intelligence agencies, the lights in the Cabinet Room went dark.
"That must be the intelligence agencies," he quipped. The lighting was quickly restored.




TRANSCRIPT: Trump backtracks on Russia comments

Earlier Tuesday, the President had offered a defiant rebuke of his critics, writing on Twitter: "While I had a great meeting with NATO, raising vast amounts of money, I had an even better meeting with Vladimir Putin of Russia."
"Sadly, it is not being reported that way - the Fake News is going Crazy!" he proclaimed.
Trump's self-defense, however, was unlikely to quell the uproar caused by Monday's news conference.
The conservative editorial page of The Wall Street Journal declared the news conference "a personal and national embarrassment" for the President, asserting he'd "projected weakness." Newt Gingrich, ordinarily a reliable voice of support, wrote on Twitter the remarks were "the most serious mistake of his presidency."
Members of Congress, including several powerful Republicans, distanced themselves from Trump's remarks and aligned themselves with US intelligence estimates that Russia had interfered in the election.
Trump surprised at fierce criticism
Immediately after Monday's news conference, Trump's mood had been buoyant, people familiar with the matter said. He walked off stage in Helsinki with little inkling his remarks would cause the firestorm they did, and was instead enthusiastic about what he felt was a successful summit.
By the time he'd returned to the White House just before 10 pm ET on Monday, however, his mood had soured. Predictably, the President was upset when he saw negative coverage of the summit on television aboard Air Force One. It was clear he was getting little support, even from the usual places.
He vented to aides traveling with him, including new communications chief Bill Shine and Miller. First lady Melania Trump was also aboard and was involved in some of the discussions, the people familiar with the matter said.
Trump, the first lady, Shine and Miller were seen in animated conversation aboard Marine One when they arrived to the White House South Lawn on Monday evening.
Correction: This story has been corrected to show the meeting involving Pence, Pompeo and Trump happened in the Oval Office.



To: longnshort who wrote (1078784)7/18/2018 7:39:54 AM
From: Mongo21162 Recommendations

Recommended By
Heywood40
sylvester80

  Respond to of 1583478
 
the trump base comes forward....43 million like this guy

[fbv]2201678196591889[/fbv]