Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Hurd who wrote (25175)	1/14/1998 11:02:00 PM
From: VALUESPEC	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 41046

David, I challege you to provide a good link for me to add to my FTEL Library. I'm not here to trash this company. You may not like what I have to say/find, but I'm not trying to skew my findings in any way. Are you? Trust me, if this company has more than just hype behind it, no matter what I, or anyone else posts, this stock will do well. If it can't stand my scrutiny, or can't stand up to the questions I bring up, then do you really want to hold the stock anyway? So what have I said so far? That company disappointed its shareholders by leading them to expect a larger company to have made the $ 2.5 mil purchase at the end of last year? That AT&T might want increase its legal fight if FTEL starts to get a serious amount of business? That the company has little sales of anything now, and that they seem to be slow in obtaining new sales of its new products? Isn't all of that true? So what if I want to re-hash what you don't want to go over. Many people may not want to hear a lot of other posts on this board, too. There is only so much time on can devote to any subject. I think it is a testiment to the FTEL story that I'm even bothering to look further into this. FTEL has a great "story". However, the facts behind the story weren't near as impressive as the story, to me- at least not as far as I can see at this point. VALUESPEC valuespec.com

To: David Hurd who wrote (25175)	1/14/1998 11:03:00 PM
From: elk	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 41046

DH, Just think about what life on this thread would be like without all the 'saviors' that drop by. We have JeanYuses, TommyBoys and now Valueless Spectators(or is it Speculaters) to save us from ourselves or even better to save the brainless, heathen savages who lurk here. They only have the noblest of desires and do all of this so they can be awarded a Medal Of Altruism. They are all such saavy market operators that they are wealthy enough to have nothing better to do with their lives than find reasons that other people should not invest in FTEL. They are all such fine and decent people. What is the number that FTEL trades at where they apologize? I would enjoy knowing if this stock hits 20 they will admit how wrong they were. Is it a deal? Well maybe Val-U-Pak-It-In will be big enough of man to say he was wrong, but I doubt it. Judging from his interpetation of the T matter as an injunction against Internet Telephony and the lack of his candor about how wrong he was in that matter, makes me believe that he will not recognize his own shortcomings. His FTEL library has been started! Hurry in and see an article that someone posted to our thread and does not relate to the company in a way that supports his position. It is good to know that he believes FTEL will be successful enough to consider an article about European phone regulations the most relevant thing to build his library from. See, he is quite capable of pasting a link onto his web page. Or Would he be dumb enough to risk violating copyrights, by placing the actual document on his web site without authorization? valuespec.com I guess that link shows the answer to that. But based upon his research and DD, I guess he could not be bothered to understand such complex legal matters. Sometimes It just makes you wonder what life would be like without them. Evan