SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: The Ox who wrote (21139)8/1/2018 9:43:14 PM
From: John Pitera4 Recommendations

Recommended By
3bar
POKERSAM
sixty2nds
The Ox

  Respond to of 33421
 
A Wake-Up Call From Japan
Central banks are withdrawing from ultra-loose monetary policy as gradually as possible, but volatility is still inevitable



By
Richard Barley

Aug. 1, 2018 7:49 a.m. ET

What happens when you wake a market from deep slumber? Japan is the latest place investors should watch.

For a long time, central banks have helped to tamp down swings in markets via ultraloose monetary policy, boosting risk appetite. But things are changing, even in the spiritual home of low interest rates.

The Japanese 10-year bond yield jumped to 0.13% on Wednesday, a day after the Bank of Japan’s latest policy decision. That’s the highest since January 2016, when the BoJ introduced negative interest rates. The one-day jump in yields of 0.08 percentage point, which followed a decline of 0.05 percentage point Tuesday, is huge in a market where bond prices have moved only fractionally for months, thanks to the BoJ’s policy of pinning yields close to zero. This could mark a regime change for markets, argue strategists at Mizuho.

Two clashing policy tweaks are at work. The BoJ Tuesday introduced forward guidance that monetary policy would stay loose. Central banks have come increasingly to rely on this tool for smoothing market expectations and hence reducing volatility. But the BoJ also said it would allow 10-year yields to move in a wider range—up to 0.2%, said Governor Haruhiko Kuroda. Markets are starting to test that new range.

The potential for bigger moves in yields is a risk for investors and a boon for traders. Investors will require a higher risk premium to hold bonds, contributing to somewhat higher yields. That could spill over into other markets where Japanese investors have flocked to put cash to work in the face of zero yields at home.

The BoJ isn’t going anywhere fast. But the big picture is one where central banks globally are pulling back gradually from years of deep involvement in markets. Snoozing through that process isn’t an option.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Bank of Japan Shift Propels Biggest Bond-Yield Jump in Two YearsRise comes one day after central bank widened trading band; ‘it’s not reflecting fundamentals or anything’


The minute policy changed announced by Bank of Japan Gov. Haruhiko Kuroda Tuesday made a large impact on the bond market Wednesday.PHOTO: TORU HANAI/REUTErs

By
Kosaku Narioka

Aug. 1, 2018 6:41 a.m. ET

TOKYO—The yield on the benchmark Japanese government bond posted its biggest percentage-point gain in two years, a day after Bank of Japan Gov. Haruhiko Kuroda said he would allow the yield to move in a wider band.

On Tuesday, Mr. Kuroda raised the BOJ’s yield cap on the 10-year Japanese government bond to 0.2% from around 0.1%. The central bank, which buys the equivalent of hundreds of billions of dollars in Japanese government bonds every year, has enforced the cap through market operations since it introduced a target of “around zero” for the bond’s yield in September 2016.

Highlighting how the bond market has become captive to central-bank policy, the yield on Wednesday quickly shot above the former cap and in afternoon trading reached 0.12%, the highest level since Feb. 3, 2017.

“It’s not reflecting fundamentals or anything,” said Chotaro Morita, head of Japan rates strategy at SMBC Nikko Securities. The market responded to the BOJ, he said, not to any change in perceptions of the economy.

The day’s gain of 0.06 percentage point was the biggest since one of 0.085 percentage point on Aug. 2, 2016, according to data provider Quick.

Prices for Japanese government bond futures fell sharply, prompting emergency margin calls from the main security-clearing house. A Japan Securities Clearing Corp. official said a few financial institutions were asked to post additional collateral.

The central bank’s big bond purchases have lowered borrowing costs for companies and consumers, but some worry they hollow out the bond market’s functions and suppress a useful signal about the state of the economy and government finances.

Market players are watching whether the yield will reach the 0.2% cap, and if so how quickly. Mr. Morita of SMBC Nikko said the BOJ might step in to tame the rise if it sees the movement as too rapid.

Takahide Kiuchi, a former BOJ policy-board member, said he views the new range as risky and warned that the central bank may not be able to enforce it if the market turns volatile. “There is the possibility that the BOJ cannot protect the ceiling,” he said.

Write to Kosaku Narioka at kosaku.narioka@wsj.com



To: The Ox who wrote (21139)8/6/2018 4:49:34 AM
From: John Pitera1 Recommendation

Recommended By
The Ox

  Respond to of 33421
 
FANG Stocks Are Big, But Asia’s Tech Giants Carry Even More Sway

Tencent, Samsung dominate their markets, which recently has led to stock-index declines.

By
Steven Russolillo and
Saumya Vaishampayan

Aug. 5, 2018 12:00 p.m. ET

Three of Asia’s big stock markets are each dominated by a single tech giant, a dynamic that fueled strong gains last year but is now becoming a source of frustration for some investors.

Tencent Holdings Ltd. TCEHY 1.96% in Hong Kong, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. in South Korea and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. TSM +0.00% Ltd. boast market capitalizations far bigger than most local peers. The trio’s collective valuation has fallen to about $924 billion, from a peak of $1.1 trillion in January, according to FactSet, as part of a selloff that has dented technology stocks globally.

The outsize influence is felt by portfolio managers, especially those whose performance is judged against single-market indexes.



“Investors have been heavily weighted those big stocks,” said Caroline Yu Maurer, Hong Kong-based head of Greater China equities at BNP Paribas Asset Management. She said the companies generating the biggest profits in an economy should naturally have the biggest market capitalizations, but added: “If they fail to deliver, people get concerned.”

Those distortions are one reason many portfolio managers prefer to compare themselves to more diversified measures. MSCI says $1.9 trillion is benchmarked against its emerging market indexes, which often can be more diversified and include more than one country.

Yet even these gauges are increasingly dependent upon Asian tech names, including the U.S.-listed Chinese titans Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and Baidu Inc. Indeed, those two along with Tencent, Samsung and TSMC account for 19% of the flagship MSCI Emerging Markets index. The MSCI China Index is even more concentrated, with Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent alone forming one-third of the index.



In contrast, Facebook Inc., Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Google parent Alphabet Inc. make up about 15% of the S&P 500’s weighting, even though the five together are worth considerably more in absolute terms than their Asian rivals and have become a bigger part of U.S. indexes in recent years.

Money managers in the U.S., too, have fretted about overly concentrated markets but recently the stock market has been able to withstand big drops from the likes of Facebook and Netflix Inc. The S&P 500 is up about this year and is shy of its record high by less than 2% through Friday’s close.

Morgan Harting, a portfolio manager at AllianceBernstein, runs a fund in New York spanning stocks, bonds and currencies that counted Tencent, Samsung and TSMC among its biggest shareholdings at the end of June. He has trimmed his stakes over the year, and these stocks make up less of his portfolio than the positions in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, as he instead looks for growth elsewhere.



“We want to be careful not to concentrate excessively the way the index does in this narrow set of consumer-focused technology stocks in China,” Mr. Harting said.

In Hong Kong, Tencent’s $424 billion market cap is over 50% larger than the Hang Seng Index’s next biggest stock, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd. Tencent has been one of the worst performers among big global tech companies, losing a quarter of its value since hitting a record high in January. It is down about 14% in 2018.

Investors using low-cost funds to track the Hang Seng, like the $11.2 billion Tracker Fund of Hong Kong , have felt the pain. That fund has fallen 5.7% this year.



Investors and analysts say some doubt is growing over whether Tencent, the world’s largest videogame publisher by revenue, will be able to maintain elevated growth. In the first quarter, institutional investors in emerging markets cut their Tencent positions for the first time since the end of 2016, according to eVestment, a research firm.

In South Korea, Samsung’s nearly $300 billion market cap is bigger than the combined value of the next 11 biggest companies in the Kospi Composite. Samsung’s 10% drop this year has helped pull the Kospi down more than 7%, making it one of Asia’s worst performing indexes. And at $208 billion, the Taiwanese chip giant TSMC is over four times bigger than its nearest domestic peer.

Recent concerns are a mirror image of the problem investors face when big companies are rallying. For Ms. Maurer at BNP Paribas, no single stock can exceed 10% of a portfolio. As the Chinese tech giants surged last year, she wished she could have bought more. “Of course it’s frustrating,” she said. “Those stocks did very well, but that’s just the reality we have to deal with.”

http://www.wsj.com/articles/fang-stocks-are-big-but-asias-tech-giants-carry-even-more-sway-1533484800?mod=hp_lista_pos2



To: The Ox who wrote (21139)8/6/2018 5:22:10 AM
From: John Pitera1 Recommendation

Recommended By
roguedolphin

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
Hi OX, this is part and only part of the reason that when you tune into Bloomberg TV every morning
from 5 to 7 am....... 2/3 of all conversations revolve around Brexit..... Hard Brexit... soft brexit.....
what are all of the ramifications... which not one can succinctly quantify in an article or even in an
interview..... or if they have.... they sure are not telling me about it......

Maybe they are selling it for $25,000 a copy?

This process is disastrous and is just not going to have a clean, spotless outcome..... and the
numbers are REALLY big.....

u go over to CNBC and it's all rainbows and lollipops and what Comcast is going to do next to enrich
there way to young on air employee's who have dreams of big stock option vesting's... dancing about
in their dreams each night.....

As Joe Kernan can tell you from experience.... at this point all of his pie in the sky GE options have
expired.... and he got nary a nickel for any of them

(GE used to own cnbc.... back in the day.... and Jack Welch also built up a real mirage of a financial
conglomerate and stepped away at the height of his glory to let Jeff Immeldt get caught holding the
burning bag of dog dropping.... that belonged on Welch's front porch.... with the doorbell having been
run.

and to think that GE was getting 70% of their revenues and earnings from their financial arm......

except somehow..... the only companies that seemed to know less than GE about running a financial
company was AIG, Lehman Brothers..... and arguably Bear Sterns and MER......

btw the way if any of you happened to have pursued the CV of George Walker of Neuberger Berman...
u may have noticed ..... all those great accomplishments while he was at GS.

Joh



To: The Ox who wrote (21139)8/6/2018 5:27:02 AM
From: John Pitera  Respond to of 33421
 
Deutsche Bank moves euro clearing from London to Frankfurt
Move by bank to divert business away from UK since Brexit vote is ‘largely symbolic’

s
Deutsche Bank has moved a “large part” of its euro clearing activity to Frankfurt from London in a boost to the efforts of the eurozone’s top financial centre to lure business away from the City before Brexit.

Germany’s biggest bank said its decision would not affect jobs because it would simply involve pushing a different button to route clearing to Eurex, the clearing division of the German exchange Deutsche Börse.

However, the change, confirmed by a spokesman and first reported by the Financial Times, will be seen as a victory in Deutsch e Börse’s ca mpaign to grab a larger slice of the euro clearing market.

Clearing, seen as a vital pillar of financial stability, is dominated by the City of London, where about €1tn (£890bn) of transactions are cleared every day.

The London Stock Exchange, which owns the London-based LCH clearing house, has warned that the loss of euro clearing could cost the City 100,000 jobs. Its shares had fallen by more than 1% in early trading in the wake of Deutsche Bank’s announcement.

A spokeswoman for Eurex said it had a market share of 8% of euro clearing, up from virtually zero a year ago.

Hubertus Väth, the chief executive of the marketing group Frankfurt Main Finance, told the FT that moving euro clearing from London to Frankfurt was “on top of our priority list from the very first day after the Brexitreferendum”.

Clearing houses act as an intermediary and guarantor between firms that buy and sell financial instruments such as interest rate swaps.

London hosted about 70% of euro transaction clearing as of 2013, according to the Bank for International Settlements.

For eurozone members, London’s dominance in euro clearing is a long-running bugbear.

In 2015, the UK government won a legal case against the European Central Bank, which had demanded that clearing houses should be based in the eurozone if they handled euro-dominated trades.

In preparation for Brexit, Brussels has proposed ideas that could give the EUmore responsibility for regulating foreign clearing houses.



http://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/jul/30/deutsche-bank-moves-euro-clearing-from-london-to-frankfurt

The former Bank of England deputy governor Charlie Bean told a House of Lords committee in 2016 he had “absolutely no doubt at all” that London would lose euro clearing after Brexit.

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/jul/30/deutsche-bank-moves-euro-clearing-from-london-to-frankfurt