SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: POKERSAM who wrote (109413)8/8/2018 2:26:08 PM
From: Shoot1st1 Recommendation

Recommended By
da_cheif™

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218589
 
"""""So I am very bullish but not so bullish I'm insane and cannot see the fact of corrections along the way."""""

You forget to use commas.....and a period

the 1st comma goes after So, the 2nd after the 1st bullish

and the period goes after the 2nd bullish,

Then the sentence make sense......

So, I am very bullish,


but not so bullish.


I am insane and cannot see the fact of corrections along the way.

Still not perfect grammar, but better.

No need to thank me.

Shootie



To: POKERSAM who wrote (109413)8/8/2018 4:21:09 PM
From: RedTowerMountain  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218589
 
[RE: POKERSAM],
Thank you for sharing your Elliott wave insights. For quite a long time I have viewed the wave principle is merely a stock makret model, it is always at least a dimension ( or a degree ) lower than the intrinsic market has. Therefore, the long term wave projection is not creditable, the number is only a simple Fibonacci extension game.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News