Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Harvey Allen who wrote (16119)	1/15/1998 8:47:00 AM
From: Dermot Burke	Respond to of 24154

o: +TLindt (1951 ) From: +ahhaha Wednesday, Jan 14 1998 11:43PM the anonymous ahah makes an interesting proposition--wasn't the navio group set up to do the job? another distracted wrong choice: Reply # of 1956 This OS, CE, is embedded, therefore limited whereas there is no OS specifically designed with managing the full breadth of cable internet access. CE has limited interactive abilities because an internet presentation on tv is limited by a lack of physical interface like keyboard or microphone. CE better not crash because you can't service pack your way out. Thus, it's functionality must be severely constrained. To some extent this is turning into a word game. It doesn't matter what kind of box your peripherals are plugged into. You care only if they are all supported, else you need two or more boxes. Seems redundant. If you need local storage or other functionality, then the tv should be split off from the entry cable to its own settop box and the other lead goes to your computer backplane. Neither the CE nor WIN can take advantage of the full power of delivery of cable. Maybe in the household that power isn't needed. NSCP claims it's an enterprise company selling e-commerce, internet-based enterprise tools, servers, and software. Who do they think they are kidding with that set of Emperor's New Clothes? They couldn't find a way to beat MSFT, so they think they can beat equally capable opponents deeply in with the establishment by selling tools, servers. and software? But NSCP can develop an OS maybe in conjunction with SUNW with business as the intended market. Such an OS would need mission criticality and high complexity software caching management. The browser could be the interfacing "desktop". That's the only way the enterprise clothes will fit. Because WIN9x, NT, CE, are market specific and none are designed with cable specific strengths and requirements, there is a window of opportunity for an enterprising company to develop a cable specific OS with need to interface, not necessarily manage, local storage. But it wouldn't need lots of peripheral driver support. All of that already exists in the installed base of PCs which can be lanned into a local cable OS server which supports say 10 PCs. A cable OS and its local cache management can take the pressure off the headend and RDC. A business would use this "terminal" as a dedicated and secure gateway to the commerce and telecommunicative world, but it also would have limited accessability from nearby desktops each with some limited browser to facilitate high speed exchange. The details need lots of work and that isn't my job, but NSCP needs to take advantage of this open window, or bye-bye.