Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (88647)	8/12/2018 2:53:01 PM
From: Steve Lokness	Respond to of 361799

<<<<No point in hog tying a new, smaller organization with that>>>>> Yup, let it grow itself into another behemoth government agency all by itself! And it will.

To: i-node who wrote (88647)	8/12/2018 2:54:58 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 361799

Air Force is a substantial bureaucracy on its own. No point in hog tying a new, smaller organization with that. At least, that would be my first reaction. The Air Force was part of the Army for a long time. When is it best to split functionality out into its own organization? Probably not yet. As for bureaucracy, there's a lot of overhead in a new organizational entity. I personally put together reorganizations that created two new independent government agencies. Tooth to tail ratio way too small. Sure would be self-gratifying, though, to create a new logo for a new hat.