Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (29842)	1/15/1998 9:45:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Bill, You really are less intelligent than you pretend to be. Why don't you go run to LeDoux and cry to them about the assay methodology they have chosen to use on BD's COC Naxos ore. Get a grip. Mark

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (29842)	1/15/1998 9:48:00 AM
From: Ron	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Bill, I keep reading your posts about nothing in the desert relative to precious. I can't understand what prompts you to keep saying this when you know many of us to assure ourselves have gone to various sites, pulled samples of our own, had them assayed at various companies, and gotten positive results. I admit no one has publically broken the secret to economical extraction, but we will most likely see that during the first half of 98. You know as well as many of us that interest in the DD has spread to companies ouside the US including Africa. A land rush of major proportions is in the infancy stage and will escalate rapidly over the next 24 months. I respect your opinions and knowledge on many items discussed on the threads, but to say that no one has any precious metals at all is totally wrong, and you have to know it. Has Maxam faked results? Has MG faked results? Has IPM faked results? etc, etc. What is your real agenda? Ron W

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (29842)	1/15/1998 10:02:00 AM
From: jnmason	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Geeeeze Bill, I guess if something is printed on paper it is the "truth"....Why don't you just admit that you don't know how this thing will turn out, and quit talking about lawsuits all the time.....Your infatuation with the term "class action" shows just what kind of person you really are.....I think you better wait to quote a news article Until a reporter runs an story that is 100% researched, and 100% unbiased journalism. Jnmason

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (29842)	1/15/1998 2:27:00 PM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

<<..As P.T. Barnum says.........>>Or, "Bring me an Elefant and I'll name him JUMBO; Bring me a Midget and I'll call him Bill or was it Tom Thumb; and Bring me a Gorilla and I'll call it Chucakong!" I will now add a disclaimer to what was added by another a few posts after the Billheretoreferedpost ( Basically I say at the Bottom Here, if standard Freegold can be found then Non Standard Complex Mineralization can infact revolutionize the mining industry...it is simply there...if there it can be recovered, if assayed by an Arizona Certified Lab as to value then Gold has Been deposited there<I am not stating values>: From The S.I. Front Page Link: SEC planning Internet guidelines 'Signposts' to show how U.S. securities laws apply to the Net REUTER WASHINGTON - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission will soon issue guidance on how federal securities laws apply to the Internet, an official said Friday. The planned move comes at a crucial time, as online financial services surge in popularity and erode national boundaries. ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ Commerce Bulletin Board ÿSilicon Investor-less ÿFTC backs data-meister self-policing ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ "IT IS A CONTINUATION of the commission's efforts over the last several years to be aware of technology and to try to address that," said Kristen Geyer, senior counsel in the SEC's office of market supervision. ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿGeyer said SEC staff members hope to issue the guidelines within a month, but they are still only in discussion about the plan. Even so, she said they are not likely to be proposed as formal rules but rather as informal guidance. ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿGeyer told a group of lawyers attending a conference here that SEC officials hope the guidelines would provide "signposts" for firms to help determine if their oversees business conducted on the Internet would fall under the SEC's regulatory oversight. ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿThe SEC is likely to suggest that firms include a prominent disclaimer when they do not intend to conduct business in the United States, she said. The agency will also probably suggest that firms with "passive" Web sites, that do not interact with potential securities customers, would not be subject to federal securities laws. ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿc 1998 Reuter Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuter content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuter. ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿSuharto signs new IMF reform deal ÿHong Kong slumps, Seoul soars ÿJudge sharply rebuffs Microsoft ÿCognizant splits into two companies ÿAn elephant, and proud of it .... Now what we have Bill, is a failure to communicate. Cool hand Luke went out in the Desert and took some assays, SFA...did a 50 pound bench test and actually milled some gold; hense found some gold...not anything to indicate that the premise herein is NOT true...there is an anomoly in many desert dirts. Period. If I disclaim properly, maybe I can post a fact like this. This is not an offer to/ blah...A placer Group claimed land that had gold on it...near a Desert Dirt. With a group of fellow investor-friends. So, to say, we collectively agreed in the premise, and the method. We put the word TALK in our research. It was intended as a comliment to all the folks here on the Threads. This is true and we never posted anywhere about it, but said once we understood the rules, we might. There is a mighty fact devoloping here. That is the fact. Chucaupt2 ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ