SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A Real American President: Donald Trump -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mrjns who wrote (88040)8/17/2018 7:42:44 AM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Honey_Bee
Thehammer

  Respond to of 458173
 



To: Mrjns who wrote (88040)8/17/2018 7:48:25 AM
From: FJB3 Recommendations

Recommended By
locogringo
Mrjns
Woody_Nickels

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 458173
 
Muslim Child Terrorist Training Camp in New Mexico Mysteriously Destroyed - DESTROYING EVIDENCE? HOW WEIRD...



Meanwhile, an NBC News crew visited the site of the arrests and found it destroyed:



NBC News reported that the compound has been “mysteriously destroyed by authorities.”



And that’s another part of this story that has sparked plenty of anger.

***

Related:

Now those child abuse suspects from New Mexico compound are just another “Muslim family”



To: Mrjns who wrote (88040)8/17/2018 7:52:20 AM
From: FJB4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Honey_Bee
locogringo
Mrjns
toccodolce

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 458173
 
I STILL BELIEVE GEORGE HW BUSH IS THE FOUNDER OF THE DEEP STATE, AND A TOTAL SCUMBAG.

JUST SAY NO! George H.W. Bush-Appointed Judge David Norton — Who Thinks He Has Presidential Powers — ORDERS President Trump to Reinstate Obama’s Tyrannical Pen-And-Phone-Implemented ‘Waters of the US’ Edict



To: Mrjns who wrote (88040)8/17/2018 7:56:25 AM
From: FJB3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Honey_Bee
Mrjns
Woody_Nickels

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 458173
 
Attorney: Former Democrat Debbie Wasserman Schultz IT Aide Imran Awan Deserves No Jail Time Because Trump, Republicans Were Mean
  • Former House IT aide Imran Awan’s attorney, Chris Gowen, filed a memo asking that his client serve no jail time for his bank fraud conviction.
  • He told an Obama-appointed judge that Trump is an “incoherent,” “desperate” president of the “Untied States.”
  • He asked for lenience by saying that Republican congressmen are “pathetic.”
An attorney filed a sentencing memo on behalf of former House IT aide Imran Awan, claiming that President Donald Trump, other Republicans, and “conspiratorial media” attacks serve as a sufficient substitute for jail time for his client’s bank fraud conviction.

Attorney Chris Gowen, a former aide to Hillary Clinton, argued to Judge Tanya Chutkan, a President Barack Obama-appointee, that Imran should be spared jail, in part because of Trump, who engaged in “incoherent rambling” about the former IT aide.

“Considering … the conduct of several government officials, including the president of the United States, Imran Awan respectfully requests this court to sentence him to time served with a fine of $4,004,” Gowen wrote in the sentencing memo filed Wednesday.

Imran pleaded guilty to lying on a loan application on July 3. He was also banned from the House network in February 2017 after congressional investigators alleged he made “unauthorized access” to House computers and other cyber violations, but faced no charges related to this.

Gowen claimed not a single problem with Imran’s Capitol Hill conduct was found.

After an investigation by the House Inspector General concluded that Imran made the “unauthorized access,” the House’s top law enforcement officer wrote that the former IT aide is “an ongoing and serious risk to the House of Representatives, possibly threatening the integrity of our information systems.”

Gowen suggested that Trump, Republicans and the media were responsible for Imran losing his Capitol Hill job, despite that the former IT aide was banned from the House computer network immediately following the internal investigation and before anyone outside of a small cadre on Capitol Hill knew about it.

“The 18 months of insane media attention and false public accusations against Imran unfairly cost Imran his job (not one accusation about Imran’s work on the Hill has been sustained),” the sentencing memo read.


But the Capitol Police said in a July 3, 2018 statement: “After finding numerous violations of House IT internal controls during the course of its investigation, the United States Capitol Police referred these findings back to House officials for administrative action.”


The alleged wrongdoing the House investigations uncovered involved violations of cybersecurity, a topic that Democrats have frequently elevated and called for increased funding for. Gowen seemed to obscure these violations, citing an op-ed in The Washington Post by former Democratic New York Rep. Steve Israel that describes the unauthorized access to computers as “using multiple usernames and passwords to skirt House rules and purchase office items.”

Gowen dismissed these allegations, and said the concern about violations in this case served to “distract” from the investigation into Trump and Russia, calling the president “desperate.”

Despite the IG’s findings and other violations apparent in public records, such as hiding LLCs – one of which took $100,000 from an Iraqi government minister – from House ethics disclosure forms, the Department of Justice, without explanation, said it could substantiate only the bank fraud charge.

Imran sent nearly $300,000 to Pakistan shortly after learning he was under investigation. Imran was arrested at the airport intending to fly to the country
. (RELATED: Fifteen Things To Know About ‘Pakistani Mystery Man’ Imran Awan)

“The irony that Donald J. Trump, of all people, expressed outrage about a case involving bank fraud is not lost on the defendant’s counsel but Imran is not before the court to discuss the president’s financial history, he is here to present his story,” Gowen told the judge.

Rep. Israel’s op-ed in The Washington Post refers to “office items” — receipts for equipment that the House IG found were falsified in ways that made it impossible for the House to track whether equipment disappeared. Gowen’s law partner previously said members of Congress “expect” staff to “to expedite things” and “ adjust the pricing.”

Gowen also said Trump and Republican congressmen, including Senate Committee on the Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, acted “without any shred of decency” in regards to Imran.

“Rep. [Louie] Gohmert and others staged an informal congressional ‘hearing’ on Imran’s case that was simultaneously pathetic, and a chilling demonstration of the propagandist power,” he added.

Gowen said Republican Reps. Gohmert of Texas, Steve King of Iowa and Ron DeSantis of Florida engaged in “unhinged speculation.” Gohmert, for example, commented on the fact that Florida Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s laptop was found in a phone booth on Capitol Hill at midnight with Imran’s Pakistani ID on top — months after he was banned from connecting to the House network.

Gohmert told The Daily Caller News Foundation that leaving the laptop “was a deliberate act by a cunning suspect” because “Imran Awan is a calculating person who made great efforts to cover his tracks, both electronically and physically,” Gohmert pointed out.

House leadership never told members or the public about the discovered laptop, which led concerned members to look into the situation, particularly after Wasserman Schultz threatened the Capitol Police chief with “consequences” if he didn’t return the evidence.

Gowen also pointed out that King told TheDCNF that Imran “should have been locked up in jail a long time ago with all his family members.”

And Grassley, an Iowa Republican, “wrote to the acting secretary of Homeland Security demanding that she produce the ‘Alien file’ for Imran and his entire extended family,” Gowen wrote in the memo. Imran began working with Capitol Hill data as a contractor in 2000 and was hired by former Florida Democratic Rep. Robert Wexler as an employee in January 2004 — the same year he became a citizen, according to Gowen’s memo, and Grassley was seeking to determine exactly when.



To: Mrjns who wrote (88040)8/17/2018 11:23:17 AM
From: FJB4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Honey_Bee
Mrjns
Thehammer
toccodolce

  Respond to of 458173
 
Shocking Report Details How CIA Hubris Exposed Agents In China, Resulting In 30 Executions - WONDER IF BRENNAN RATTED THEM OUT TO HIS FELLOW COMMUNISTS

zerohedge.com

A bombshell new report in Foreign Policy reveals that up to 30 CIA agents and assets working in China were identified and executed by Chinese counterintelligence over a two year period after the CIA's encrypted communications system was infiltrated.

The report is based on former and current unnamed CIA officials who were part of the program, which established a network of spies across China. The in-country spies communicated with their CIA handlers via an online system capable of being logged into from any laptop or computer.

But when starting in late 2010 Chinese authorities began to sweep up the network of spies for interrogation and eventual execution, the CIA was "shellshocked" in the words of one former official, and for eight years a joint FBI-NSA-CIA investigation has sought answers as to what went wrong in what is widely considered "one of the CIA’s worst failures in decades".

For the first time, it appears answers have been made public. Foreign Policy asks, "How were the Chinese able to roll up the network?" and begins by answering:

Now, nearly eight years later, it appears that the agency botched the communication system it used to interact with its sources, according to five current and former intelligence officials. The CIA had imported the system from its Middle East operations, where the online environment was considerably less hazardous, and apparently underestimated China’s ability to penetrate it.

The CIA officials paint a picture of both hubris on the part of American operatives and shockingly sophisticated abilities of the Chinese to gain access to the CIA communications system, which the Americans wrongly thought impenetrable.

One officials is cited as saying, “The attitude was that we’ve got this, we’re untouchable.”

“You could tell the Chinese weren’t guessing. The Ministry of State Security [which handles both foreign intelligence and domestic security] were always pulling in the right people,” one of the officials told Foreign Policy. “When things started going bad, they went bad fast.”

News of the roundup and detention of a dozen or more spies in China was first revealed in a May 2017 story in the New York Times, but Foreign Policy's sources say it was actually around 30, with some offering a high figure. The FP report contains this stunning line: "All the CIA assets detained by Chinese intelligence around this time were eventually killed, the former officials said."

The officials told FP that the only plausible explanation for how Chinese counterintelligence was able to accurately expose that many US spies as quickly as they did could only be chalked up to hacking the secret communication system.

The officials explained that when a new asset was recruited, the person at first communicated with their CIA handlers via an "interim" or "throwaway" system set up to shield the rest of the network from the possibility that the new asset could either be a double agent or be quickly tracked or exposed. Later, the agent was brought into the main covert communication platform exploitation of which was considered potentially far more disastrous as it would risk revealing broader clandestine operations in China, however unlikely.

Foreign Policy explains how the temporary system may have been used to penetrate the permanent platform:

Although they used some of the same coding, the interim system and the main covert communication platform used in China at this time were supposed to be clearly separated. In theory, if the interim system were discovered or turned over to Chinese intelligence, people using the main system would still be protected—and there would be no way to trace the communication back to the CIA. But the CIA’s interim system contained a technical error: It connected back architecturally to the CIA’s main covert communications platform. When the compromise was suspected, the FBI and NSA both ran “penetration tests” to determine the security of the interim system. They found that cyber experts with access to the interim system could also access the broader covert communications system the agency was using to interact with its vetted sources, according to the former officials.

Ultimately, as one CIA official is cited in the FP report as saying, the CIA had “fucked up the firewall” between the two systems.

It's believed that either a sole double-agent, or single exposure and arrest of a US asset therefore could have led to a breach in the entire China-wide covert network, which up till then the CIA had worked to keep highly compartmentalized.

And this brings up another key factor in how the communication network could have been initially penetrated...

Jerry Chun Shing Lee, 53, was arrested in January after entering the US from Hong Kong. He was found to be in possession of handwritten notebooks containing the names and contact information of CIA employees and informants. Lee is an American citizen who left the CIA in 2007, where he had been a case officer running Chinese sources since 1994.

FP explains of the possible role that former CIA officer Jerry Chun Shing Lee, indicted earlier this year on conspiring to give Chinese spies highly classified information about the CIA activities in China, played in exposing agents' identities:

During the investigation, the task force identified three potential causes of the failure, the former officials said: A possible agent had provided Chinese authorities with information about the CIA asset network, some of the CIA’s spy work had been sloppy and might have been detected by Chinese authorities, and the communications system had been compromised. The investigators concluded that a “confluence and combination of events” had wiped out the spy network, according to one of the former officials.

Eventually, U.S. counterintelligence officials identified Lee, the former CIA officer who had worked extensively in Beijing, as China’s likely informant. Court documents suggest Lee was in contact with his handlers at the Ministry of State Security through at least 2011.

But the CIA officials involved in China operations emphasized that not even Lee though occupying a relatively high position in operationshimself had enough access to be able to expose the full network of operations.

The officials explained to FP that, "Information about sources is so highly compartmentalized that Lee would not have known their identities," resulting in the following conclusion: "That fact and others reinforced the theory that China had managed to eavesdrop on the communications between agents and their CIA handlers."

The other interesting detail from FP's report is that the CIA decided to use an internet-based communications system previously utilized in the Middle East, but not suited to evade China's much more sophisticated surveillance and security detection systems.

As FP explains, "The system was not designed to withstand the scrutiny of a place like China, where the CIA faced a highly sophisticated intelligence service and a completely different online environment."

Meanwhile one particular pressing question, which Foreign Policy doesn't seem to address, remains: with perhaps the entirety of the CIA's clandestine eyes and ears and China wiped out through agency hubris and underestimating Chinese hacking capabilities, is the United States now flying completely blind on China?



To: Mrjns who wrote (88040)8/17/2018 11:37:11 AM
From: James Seagrove4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Honey_Bee
Mrjns
Thehammer
toccodolce

  Respond to of 458173
 
In Trump’s second-term Twitter, Facebook etc will need to reinvent themselves or go under. This is the last grasp and gasp by agents of Deep State. I wondered what I would say if I saw Strzok and Paige dining somewhere, I know now, I would start chanting “DEEP STATE” loudly as possible.



To: Mrjns who wrote (88040)8/17/2018 2:18:34 PM
From: FJB5 Recommendations

Recommended By
Honey_Bee
locogringo
Mrjns
Stock Puppy
Woody_Nickels

  Respond to of 458173
 
Poll: Majority of Millennial Women Do Not Identify as Feminist - THIS SOUNDS VERY, VERY POSITIVE!

BY FAITH MOORE
AUGUST 16, 2018
pjmedia.com

Feminist website Refinery29 got more than it bargained for when it teamed up with CBS to poll 842 women ages 18-35 about — among other things — feminism. When asked, “Do you consider yourself to be a feminist, or not?” over half (54 percent) of respondents said, “No.” Not only that, only 19 percent of respondents identified as Republican. In fact, the largest group of women polled (34 percent) identified as Democrat, with 27 percent identifying Independent, and 20 percent unsure of their political party.

“These are surprising results,” writes Refinery29’s Ashley Alese Edwards. “Feminism seems to be more en vogue than ever,” she insists, “even men call themselves feminists now.” And what about “the Women’s March, the 'resistance' (which is largely women-led) and #MeToo,” Edwards laments. How could you not be feminist?!

To her credit, Edwards actually interviewed some of these strange non-feminist creatures, presumably to find out what on earth was wrong with them
. Leah, a 22-year old independent, told Edwards, “I feel like the movement has been largely taken over by far-left wing activists that make it nearly impossible for me to identify with.” She also called feminists “disingenuous” for denying “any negative emotional backlash or health risks for women having an abortion.” She continued, “Although not all women suffer emotionally or physically after an abortion, many do, and their stories are ignored by mainstream feminism because it doesn't fit the narrative of abortion being a good thing for women.”

A 25-year-old Republican named Stephanie, whom Edwards spoke to, even went so far as to say, “I don't think women in the modern western world are oppressed.” Stephanie continued, “I think modern feminists try to create a boogeyman out of what they call the patriarchy and hunt it down, but it's not necessary.... Men and women have different strengths and weaknesses. Acknowledging that is not sexist.” The truth! It burns!

Even the Democrats Edwards spoke to couldn’t be trusted. Malina, a 34-year-old Democrat, said that the feminist movement has devolved into bickering over “the tiniest politically incorrect commentary.” Edwards says that the common thread among women who don’t identify as feminists was that “they simply don’t see themselves reflected in the current movement.” But how can this be? Feminism is empowerment for women! It’s equality! It’s social justice! It’s death to the patriarchy! It’s... it’s... hello? Is anybody out there? Can anyone hear me? Wait. How did I get in this echo chamber?

More than anything else, this survey reveals a truth that many of us already know: there is a whole country full of regular people that the media doesn’t even know is there. Major news outlets like The New York Times and CNN regularly run stories that show how far removed they are from the pulse of the nation. (If you’re not sure what I’m talking about, check out this New York Times piece about living with “white privilege,” or this CNN article about how the “patriarchy” is killing people.)

It might be easy for those steeped in feminist ideology to say that these poll results show how much more work feminists still have to do. Clearly feminists just need to work harder to convince women to break free of the shackles of oppression and become “empowered!” But none of the women Edwards spoke to sounded oppressed. In fact, it sounded distinctly like they were saying it was modern feminism that was becoming oppressive.

The majority of millennial women do not identify as feminist. They feel that the ideals of feminism have been corrupted beyond recognition. But the media continues to act like feminism is just the air we breathe. Something’s got to give. Let’s not let it be us.If the future is female, let it represent who we really are, not some out-of-touch media version of us. We are not feminists. We’re women.