Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : NNVC - NanoViricides, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: donpat who wrote (10909)	8/20/2018 8:14:11 PM
From: BoredMember	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12873

Again, as I'm not good with complex concepts, can you explain how owning the rights to license something is the same as owning the actual IP? I know, for example, that New Era may have the licensing rights to make NY Yankee hats, but they don't actually own the IP. And I know that a local coca-cola bottler has the licensing rights to bottle Coke, and exclusive rights within an area to the syrups and mixing ratios/manufacturing plants to make coke, but doesn't own the IP. And I know that a local McDonalds franchise has licensing rights to the McDonalds logo and exclusive rights within an area to the food products (if they can be called that) but doesn't actually own the IP. But I don't know how Nanoviricides having the licensing rights to the nanoviricides means they also *own* the IP? Obviously, too complex a concept for me.