To: SE who wrote (6401 ) 1/15/1998 1:06:00 PM From: Jonathan Brown Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10368
Scott, it struck me as odd too. I neglected to ask him how many shares, which would have been to the point. Incidentally, and please correct me if I'm wrong, aren't the insider trading requirements for bulletin board stocks less stringent than those for Nasdaq-listed companies? If so, then it's entirely possible Fearnow's statement was within bounds. I asked for confirmation by someone on the thread because I felt funny reporting what I'd heard from Fearnow. After I hung up, I asked myself, Does this make me feel better or worse? Is this a legitimate company or a con game? I'm sorry if that's harsh. It's a reflection of my uncertainty. Here I am, investing in a company whose products I've never seen, whose services I've never used, whose officers I've never met. The imagination can run wild. I'm not even sure if the thread calms or excites me. Both, I suppose! Given our thread's history, I'll venture to say that's not so surprising. It has been interesting. As for me, I've reduced but not yet eliminated my stake. I'm curious to see how this pans out. Let's see what the next few days bring. Folks, please accept my apologies if I'm being unfair or insulting to the company. I honestly don't mean to be. I'm writing what I suspect others are thinking and feeling. It may turn out that threads on small caps, despite the great research we've seen, are as much vehicles of expression as information. So for readers out there, take what I say, what anyone says, for its one indisputable value: amusement. Then watch the price, investigate fundamentals, and draw your own conclusions. Good luck to us all. Jon