Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (36943)	1/15/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Respond to of 55532

With all respect, I never attacked you, Beg pardon? You've done it repeatedly in here and have indicated you've done it in real life. i.e. 'If' you were to shootdown diners at a local fast-food place, would you deserve the death penaLty? My concern is 'why' you would present your question in that fashion? What 'interest' do you have in doing so? Hard to figure out what you're saying here. You're not very lucid this morning. But it does give a great example of a fundamental problem you've long displayed: trying to think too much. You put so much energy into trying to figure out why someone asked a question or made a statement, that you never notice what the actual question or statement was. When you're at McDonalds, and are asked "Do you want fries with that?", it must be an excruciating experience for you. I can picture you pausing for a while to reflect on the motivations of the server who asked you the question, wondering if "fries" is a threat, and calling the police from the manager's office. My only critique of you is that you are not 'objective' in the least and seem to want to present yourself that way. I don't happen to agree with that assessment, nor have I seen that as the sole basis of your activities against him. From here, it looks more like your basis has been solely that he refused to agree with you. You started attacking him before he even went so far as to disagree. But, for the sake of argument, let's assume that your statement that Tonto is not objective is true. Is that just cause for complaining to enforcement agencies about him and threatening legal action?