SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A Real American President: Donald Trump -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FJB who wrote (89547)8/25/2018 11:23:23 AM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Honey_Bee

  Respond to of 454616
 
Flashback: Rep. Jason Chaffetz Destroyed Lying Robert Mueller Before Congress – Caught Him Lying
August 25, 2018, 8:33 am by Jim Hoft
In June of 2013 Obama’s FBI Director Robert Mueller sat before Congress and discussed spying on Americans. Then Representative Jason Chaffetz destroyed Mueller during the questioning.Chaffetz and another Representative caught Mueller lying. ...
At a House Judiciary Committee hearing on June 13, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) asked FBI Director Robert Mueller if the National Security Agency (NSA) needs specific court approval before listening to a domestic phone call.

Mueller said yes.

Analysis of leaked NSA documents by Glenn Greenwald and James Ball of the Guardian suggests that this is not true.

Here’s the exchange from the June 13 hearing:

nder section 215 [of The Patriot Act], if you’ve gotten information from metadata, and you [decide], ‘gee, this phone number, 873-whatever, looks suspicious and we ought to actually get the contents of that phone.’ Do you need a new specific warrant?” Nadler asked.

After a brief exchange, the congressman asked again: “If you wanted to listen to the [content of a phone call] —”

Mueller cut him off: “Then you would have to get a special, a particularized order from the FISA Court directed at that particular phone and that particular individual.”

Nadler immediately disputed this statement, claiming he heard a conflicting answer at a classified briefing, and the two men basically agreed to disagree.

After the hearing was over, however, Nadler was contacted by the White House and subsequently retracted his claim.