SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E who wrote (7839)1/15/1998 2:43:00 PM
From: Steve Andrew  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11098
 
Yo Jm...

As usual, you are making things up or spinning them into something that fits your agenda. If you go back to my recent posts nowhere will you find any references to "big eaters" or any other nonsense you suggest. These guys settled, they paid next to nothing, and PRST silenced a few critics...thats it...period.
Bottom line, all your talk and hype and BS about new alliances, patents,new products, meaningless awards (remember Borland, the software company, they too won numerous industry and publication awards....what happened to their stock?),and "excess" capacity is not doing squat to lift your beloved PRST stock. Cabot, Chapman, Howard (probably) and others are all selling, selling , and selling. At least I have the decency to admit when I'm wrong. Can you say the same? All you PRST bulls (Tom aside, as he merely attempts to stay to facts) are
desperate (as the shorts may have been a year-and-a-half ago) to believe the "amazing potential of PRST." Guess what ? That's all it will ever be at best. You are victims of emotional, non-credible, promotion.
JM....one more thing....if you are so quick to declaim me, how is it that you know the language of Ivan's settlement "dismissed with prejudice". You claim not to be a shill, but I think it is quite apparent you are as your contacts inside PRST feed you like a seal in a zoo tank.

To All....
Why is it that PRST, a "publically held" company not reporting to all of its shareholders the exact judicial terms of the settlement? I know the defendants were not the ones looking for any secrecy or judicial seal.
Scott,
Feel free to accuse me of anything your little brain desires. I have been a professional trader/investor for near 16 yrs and you are LOSING money on a dumb investment....Knock yourself out.
Others,
Good luck you'll need it ("Cause the company ain't your friend)

P.S. I'll never cry to any webmistress or other about being called any names. I do believe in FULL public discourse and little people with little vocabularies and smaller minds are not to be feared.