Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lml who wrote (148921)	9/5/2018 10:43:49 AM
From: Art Bechhoefer	5 Recommendations Recommended By Jim Mullens lml manning18 recycled_electron VinnieBagOfDonuts Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197254

lml -- Yes, I was incorrect in mentioning Samsung instead of LG in the Quanta case, as I pointed out in my earlier response to Jim Mullen. Also, noted in the comments from a law firm that participated in a friend of the court filing in that case, the patent exhaustion view of the court did not cancel or invalidate a contractual agreement, which is the exception that, in my view, justifies Qualcomm's licensing agreements with firms making devices that use QCOM patent claims. Art