SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tech who wrote (2165)1/15/1998 2:46:00 PM
From: tech  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3391
 
angel, in your next post, please state why you posted false information on this thread. Please tell us why you lied about what NASDAQ told you. Please tell us why you "claimed" CSGI had previously applied for NASDAQ, when they had not.

Please feel free to tell us all how much CRAP you have posted.

There have been so many retractions and apologies on this thread that it is truly hilarious.

I can't wait to see your apology once the NASDAQ listing comes through.

I wonder what kind of crap you will have to post then?

I guess we will have to stay tuned.



To: tech who wrote (2165)1/15/1998 3:43:00 PM
From: angel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3391
 
So tell me if I understand you correctly. You are saying the things in this old post I have bolded below are lies?

To: Shawn Murphy (0 )
From: Shawn Murphy Wednesday, Dec 4 1996 11:00PM EST
Reply # of 6074

The stock to look at for the next two weeks are (CSGI) and (CSH)

CSGI (ConSygen) - this is a so called "year 2000 "Co. that has software that automatically corrects the problem. The latest info. has it that they are to announce a MAJOR contract with a multi-billion dollar Co. This should move this stock well into the teens. I will post the name of the Co. the contract is with on CSGI's tread shortly. The other news is that the Co. will have a NASDAQ listing shortly and has had talks about mergers with others. This one will MOVE.

I would bold the word MOVE but you were right it did move----- straight DOWN. Since you say you are not Shawn then I think you should have no problem saying the things that Shawn wrote were LIES.