Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : biotech firesales -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: atticus4paws who wrote (3570)	9/5/2018 3:55:32 PM
From: DaveAu	1 Recommendation Recommended By Biotech Jim Respond to of 3661

I don't know the answer to that question but we only saw GAG reduction at the 2nd dose level. The company's theory is that all the IDS is being taken up by cells. Next cohort (already enrolled) should tell the tale. Disclosure: long

To: atticus4paws who wrote (3570)	9/5/2018 3:57:12 PM
From: scaram(o)uche	1 Recommendation Recommended By ghmm Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3661

Thanks for that! GAG levels in urine are variable, and it's two patients. The results presented are next to meaningless, in context, and Maxim is pissing in the wind like everyone else on twitter. We get liver biopsy data in February, and the share price has dropped to where it was before the "runup" in anticipation of this presentation (which should never have been conceived). Macrae's stance, if it is being represented correctly, is indefensible. But he may very well be correct, and I'm cheering for patients. edit: closing block, half a million on ask

To: atticus4paws who wrote (3570)	9/5/2018 6:30:59 PM
From: scaram(o)uche	Respond to of 3661

>> pissing in the wind << I had already seen Maxim's post at twitter. I didn't mean to seem dismissive. It's just like.... which possible explanation do we want to pick? Eeeeny, miney, mo..... But I took it seriously, and tried to look for bkgd. Couldn't find anything that wasn't protected by a $$ barrier, but it seems like a good thing to consider.... does nitrogen content of urine or ?? effect the interpretation of results? Just to be clear.... I wasn't being dismissive, thanks for putting his comments here. Rick