SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Investor Clouseau who wrote (26270)9/14/2018 3:50:28 PM
From: Investor Clouseau  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27666
 
i am a Prophet and i am a Beloved of God.



To: Investor Clouseau who wrote (26270)9/20/2018 2:18:32 PM
From: Investor Clouseau  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27666
 
God works in mysterious ways, and His table could have more than 3 legs to ensure proper balance among all religions.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (19919)11/19/2002 10:30:12 PM
From: Investor ClouseauRead Replies (4) of 26269

Last night I was struggling to sleep as I was considering what is to me, obvious evidence of God’s will. Looking at the past evidence it is clear to me what God desires, but I could not determine why He desires it. This is as it should be, because no human can comprehend the true greatness of God or His plan.

I asked myself “why did God allow Abraham to spare both of his sons, Isaac and Ishmael.” Clearly God desired both sons to live for a reason. IMO, because He was looking forward to the future.

God knew that to Isaac’s descendents He would send word of His Message to Jews through Jesus Christ, even as He knew that not all would believe.

God also knew that to Ishmael’s descendents He would send word of His Message through the Prophet Muhammad (peace be with him).

This is when I was given a flash of insight. “If God commanded Abraham to build a table upon which He would work; would it not require at least three legs of proper proportion, in order to stand?”

IC