Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1089642)	9/22/2018 10:07:56 AM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583913

you side with the deep state we know

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1089642)	9/22/2018 12:48:37 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583913

If that were the choice, but it isn't. The choice is whether of not to believe corrupt FBI agents and deep state democrats operatives working in collusion with corrupt DOJ officials.....or not to believe them even after they've ALL been expose as liars.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1089642)	9/22/2018 1:38:02 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Respond to of 1583913

OK, side with the DOJ: “It’s a reflection of us still not knowing,” Page told Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) when questioned about texts she and Strzok exchanged in May 2017 as Robert Mueller was being named a special prosecutor to take over the Russia investigation. With that statement, Page acknowledged a momentous fact: After nine months of using some of the most awesome surveillance powers afforded to U.S. intelligence, the FBI still had not made a case connecting Trump or his campaign to Russia’s election meddling. Page opined further, acknowledging “it still existed in the scope of possibility that there would be literally nothing” to connect Trump and Russia, no matter what Mueller or the FBI did. - The Hill