To: Heywood40 who wrote (1089863 ) 9/22/2018 8:34:18 PM From: Broken_Clock 1 RecommendationRecommended By
Respond to Just Two NY Times Paragraphs On Russiagate - A Striking Admission Tyler Durden The New York Times published an epic 10,000 word piece entitled "The Plot to Subvert and Election - Unraveling the Russia Story So Far."Times' summary of everything that can be definitively established thus far after two years of national obsession and inquiry into alleged Russian election meddling and influence that supposedly ushered Trump into the White House in 2016. massive investigative piece has the following lede at the top: For two years, Americans have tried to absorb the details of the 2016 attack — hacked emails, social media fraud, suspected spies — and President Trump’s claims that it’s all a hoax . The Times explores what we know and what it means.— which though contradictory — are incredibly revealing about the nature of the whole 'Russiagate' scandal . Times journalists President Trump’s Twitter outbursts that it is all a “hoax” and a “witch hunt,” in the face of a mountain of evidence to the contrary , have taken a toll on public comprehension. [url=]Moon of Alabama blog astutely observes, after one-hundred-and-seventy-eight paragraphs featuring repetition of "unproven intelligence claims, spin around a few facts and lots of innuendo" the same authors finally admit that Trump is actually right .candid admission : Mr. Trump’s frustration with the Russian investigation is not surprising. He is right that no public evidence has emerged showing that his campaign conspired with Russia in the election interference or accepted Russian money. [url=]the "mountain of evidence" at the opening becomes Trump "is right that no public evidence has emerged" .attempting to tie all the "evidence" together which ultimately ends on a whimper . campaign conspired with Russia." This is a pattern: ample words for Trump-Russia innuendo; quiet acknowledgment of no evidence. And 0 words on what has been debunked. t.co pic.twitter.com/igNIxEXuHr September 20, 2018 Again, The Times began by citing "a mountain of evidence" in paragraph 5, but ends with: " Mr. Trump’s frustration with the Russian investigation is not surprising. He is right that no public evidence has emerged..."
