Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TEDennis who wrote (2183)	1/15/1998 6:58:00 PM
From: tech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3391

I appreciate you emailing Ron Bishop and getting his views on this issue as well. I called my financial advisor and told him about what feltburner posted. I then asked him to check it out and call me back. In that time period I called several other programmers from different companies such as SCBI, VIAS, and SEEC and asked them the following questions. I specifically asked if a client hadn't sent all the code and their were files missing would that cause a parsing error ? They all confirmed that yes since parsing is the initial step in performing a detailed analysis of the code, an error may result if there is code missing. In that case it would show that the client needs to find more code. I also asked them if that was a way of determining if you have all the code and they said yes. Then I asked about the difference between parsing error and a conversion error, and they all stated categorically that they are two different things. After this, I received a fax from my advisor and it stated that he called ConSyGen and they didn't use a parser for the date field analysis and correction of the MOT pilots and no one has heard anything about any errors. I posted that on this thread. I appreciate your comments and look forward to the results of what you find out.