Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1090383)	9/26/2018 10:50:51 AM
From: locogringo	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1577985

Rachel Maddow LIES comrade. She lies frequently and with ease. Idiots that watch her show are unable to understand that.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1090383)	9/26/2018 1:52:14 PM
From: Broken_Clock	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577985

Get the whole story dude. The first accuser has yet to even present anything to the SJC, and same with Ramirez. Kavanaugh's atty on CBS this morning Nora O’Donnell: Is the evidence mounting against your client? Beth Wilkinson: No, I wouldn’t say that, Nora. As you know those are statements that were made relatively recently and sadly this is an allegation from almost 36 years ago. And there was at the time no report which is understandable. But the first time these allegations came to light as far as we know from reading the reports in the media, Dr. Ford told her therapist and told her husband. They announced that there were notes and there was a lie detector test but as I understand it they did not turn any of those over to the senate committee even though they were requested. So, the information that would have shown what she said at the very first time when she revealed these allegations have not been turned over to the senate. So Kavanaugh has already provided his written planner form the time in question but the accuser hasn't supplied any written proof at all. The SJC asked Ramirez lawyer for a written statement and he refused. he said, if we get an FBI investigation completed then we will talk to the SJC. I watched it in Maddow. You should too.