SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (1090632)9/27/2018 12:59:53 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574356
 
Brett Kavanaugh and America’s ‘Himpathy’ Reckoning

Rarely has society’s tendency to sympathize with powerful men been so thoroughly on display.
Sept. 26, 2018

By Kate Manne

Ms. Manne is the author of “Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny.”


Colleen Tighe

Brett Kavanaugh is a “great gentleman,” President Trump said at a White House news conference last week. “ I feel so badly for him. This is not a man who deserves this.” At no point on that occasion did Mr. Trump say the name of the woman, Christine Blasey Ford, who had accused Judge Kavanaugh of sexual assault. After further allegations about Judge Kavanaugh’s behavior were reported on Sunday night, Mr. Trump doubled down: What was going on was “most unfair” to Judge Kavanaugh, who is “an outstanding person.”

When it comes to the moral deficiencies exhibited by Mr. Trump and other supporters of the judge, many critics speak about lack of empathy as the problem. It isn’t. Mr. Trump, as he has shown clearly in the Kavanaugh confirmation process, seems to have no difficulty taking another person’s perspective, and then feeling and expressing a sympathetic or congruent moral emotion.

The real problem is that the people Mr. Trump feels with and for are most frequently powerful men who have been credibly accused of serious crimes and wrongdoing. He felt sorry for Michael Flynn, referring to him as a “good guy.” More recently, he felt bad for Paul Manafort. And, in the case of Judge Kavanaugh, Mr. Trump feels sorry for a man accused of sexual assault while erasing and dismissing the perspective of his female accusers.

Mr. Trump is manifesting what I call “himpathy” — the inappropriate and disproportionate sympathy powerful men often enjoy in cases of sexual assault, intimate partner violence, homicide and other misogynistic behavior.

There is a plethora of recent cases, from the Stanford swimmer Brock Turnerto the Maryland school gunman Austin Rollins, fitting this general pattern: discussion focuses excessively on the perpetrator’s perspective, on the potential pain driving him or on the loss of his bright future. And the higher a man rises in the social hierarchy, the more himpathy he tends to attract. Thus, the bulk of our collective care, consideration, respect and nurturing attention is allotted to the most privileged in our society.

Once you learn to spot himpathy, it becomes difficult not to see it everywhere: in men such as the former editor of The New York Review of Books Ian Buruma, who published a self-indulgent essay by a former Canadian talk-show host accused of sexual assault and harassment by more than 20 women; in women like the five Republicans whom CNN convened recently to voice support for Judge Kavanaugh (“Tell me, what boy hasn’t done this in high school?” asked one, shrugging himpathetically). But we’re in a moment during which himpathy is so thoroughly on display, in such a public way, that the time is ripe to push for a mass moral reckoning.

What the Kavanaugh case has revealed this week is that himpathy can, at its most extreme, become full-blown gendered sociopathy: a pathological moral tendency to feel sorry exclusively for the alleged male perpetrator — it was too long ago; he was just a boy; it was a case of mistaken identity — while relentlessly casting suspicion upon the female accusers. It also reveals the far-ranging repercussions of this worldview: It’s no coincidence that many of those who himpathize with Judge Kavanaugh to the exclusion of Dr. Blasey are also avid abortion opponents, a position that requires a refusal to empathize with girls and women facing an unwanted pregnancy.

What makes himpathy so difficult to counter is that the mechanisms underlying it are partly moral in nature: Sympathy and empathy are pro-social moral emotions, which makes it especially hard to convince people that when they skew toward the powerful and against the vulnerable, they become a source of systemic injustice. So, for those for whom himpathy is a mental habit prompted by biased social forces, and not an entrenched moral outlook, the first step to solving the problem is simply learning to recognize when it’s at work, and to be wary of its biasing influence.

The second step to solving the problem of himpathy is listening to girls and women. Do you wonder why someone might not come forward to report sexual assault as an adolescent girl? Listen to Dr. Blasey, who told The Washington Post that at the time she was terrified that she would be in trouble if her parents realized she had been at a party where teenagers were drinking. She recalled thinking: “I’m not ever telling anyone this. This is nothing, it didn’t happen, and he didn’t rape me.” It wasn’t until years later, with the help of a therapist, that she emerged from this denial and recognized the episode as traumatic.

In other words, like many women, Dr. Blasey needed a long time to break a silence born out of society’s entrenched deference to privileged men. It’s a deference that Mr. Trump and Judge Kavanaugh’s other supporters are now demonstrating vividly.

Kate Manne is an assistant professor of philosophy at Cornell and the author of “Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny.”

nytimes.com



To: Brumar89 who wrote (1090632)9/27/2018 1:18:31 AM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574356
 
Message 31808993



To: Brumar89 who wrote (1090632)9/27/2018 5:47:26 AM
From: puborectalis1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Brumar89

  Read Replies (7) | Respond to of 1574356
 
Support for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh has fallen to its lowest levels since President Donald Trump announced his selection in July, according to new polling. Opposition to Kavanaugh's nomination now exceeds support for the nominee. Support for Kavanaugh among Republican women has dropped 18 points after the second of three sexual misconduct allegations were made against the judge.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (1090632)9/27/2018 6:54:40 AM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations

Recommended By
D.Austin
locogringo

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574356
 
Anti-Trumper accusing Kavanaugh of raping his friend RECANTS after he’s outed!!
SEP. 26, 2018 10:02 PM BY THE RIGHT SCOOPNO COMMENTS

Facebook Twitter Email

A Rhode Island man who hates Trump called into Sheldon Whitehouse’s office to say that Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge had raped a friend of his on a boat in 1985.

Kavanaugh was then asked about the specificity of these allegations by the Judiciary Committee in an official interview, and of course he denied that this ever happened.

The Judiciary Committee then released the transcript of that interview with the accuser’s name redicated. However the tweets weren’t redacted and people soon found out that the man who made the accusation was Jeffrey Catalan. You can imagine the response this man got.

Apparently it was so overwhelming that he completely recanted, saying he’d made a mistake and apologized to everyone:

Do everyone who is going crazy about what I had said I have recanted because I have made a mistake and apologize for such mistake

— Jeffrey Catalan (@JeffreyCatala16) September 26, 2018



That’s the short of the story of it. If you want to see why we call him an anti-Trumper, just look at this Twitter account OR read the Judiciary Committee interview transcripts where they asked Kavanaugh about this in the official interview, which is below:











This is the kind of horse**** Kavanaugh has to put up with because the Democrats have a hate-on for him and a love-on for baby murder.

Despicable.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (1090632)9/27/2018 6:56:16 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
locogringo

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574356
 
BREAKING: Man Tells Senate GOP He May Have “Had The Encounter” With FordPosted at 12:45 am on September 27, 2018 by Miranda Morales

Share On Facebook
Share On Twitter

Senate Judiciary Committee staffers twice interviewed a man this week who believes he, not Brett Kavanaugh, may be the man who “had the encounter with Dr. Ford in 1982 that is the basis of his complaint,” an investigative report released late Wednesday revealed. Committee staff first spoke to the man Monday, then again Tuesday.

“Committee staff have a second interview with a man who believes he, not Judge Kavanaugh, had the encounter with Dr. Ford in the summer of 1982 that is the basis of her allegation. He described his recollection of their interaction in some detail.”

Following the second phone interview, they were provided a “more in-depth written statement from the man interviewed twice previously who believes he, not Judge Kavanuagh, had the encounter in question with Dr. Ford.”

View image on Twitter





Burgess Everett

?@burgessev





Judiciary is also talking to someone who thinks he forced himself on Dr. Ford not Judge Kavanaugh

10:35 PM - Sep 26, 2018


2,094


2,359 people are talking about this



Twitter Ads info and privacy

To make things more confusing, the same report mentions that the Committee was contacted by a second man who thinks he might have had the encounter with Dr. Ford.

There is no reason for either of these men to come forward to tell investigators that they might have committed a crime that has no statute of limitations. Obviously the Democrats will say that they could have been bribed or paid off by Kavanaugh or the GOP. But if either of these man have any type of life at all, there really isn’t anything the GOP could offer them that would make up for the loss of everything – and possibly liberty – that could be at issue.

In addition, the Committee was forwarded an anonymous letter by Sen. Kamala Harris’s office received making yet another claim of sexual assault against the Supreme Court nominee. This claim asserts that Kavanaugh and others raped her in the back seat of a car.

View image on Twitter





Burgess Everett

?@burgessev





Judiciary Committee has actually received yet another letter with an allegation against Kavanaugh

10:34 PM - Sep 26, 2018


73


128 people are talking about this



Twitter Ads info and privacy

This situation was already crazy, and it will keep getting crazier until Sen. Grassley allows a vote, and then Sen. McConnell presses for a full vote. I was texting with a girlfriend earlier today who couldn’t keep up with the drama and wanted the TL;DR version. After updating her, I said, “They just need to vote. The Dems just keep seeking delays so they can create more accusations.” She replied, “Before you know it, he’ll be the Zodiac killer.” I started to laugh, but then I just couldn’t. It’s too close to being a possibility to find funny anymore.

Our system is being mocked by people sworn to uphold its principles and our founding documents. Time to vote, and maybe even throw a few people in jail afterward.