SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Return to Sender who wrote (81291)10/1/2018 11:51:45 PM
From: Sam  Respond to of 95567
 

This is a forecast from Apacer's president for the NAND and DRAM markets. However, if you look at the articles linked at the bottom of the page, one of them has him saying back in May that the NAND price rally would end in Q3, which it definitely hasn't. So take everything with several grains of salt. No one, not even the executives of companies in the business, can actually forecast memory prices very well.

Memory market growth promising: Q&A with Apacer president CK Chang
Siu Han, Taipei; Jessie Shen, DIGITIMES
Monday 1 October 2018
digitimes.com

The memory-chip market exhibited impressive growth in 2017 as undersupply drove up both the DRAM and NAND flash prices. However, oversupply has re-emerged this year casting a shadow over the sector. The market growth still looks promising despite short-term challenges, according to CK Chang, president for memory module firm Apacer Technology.

In a recent interview with Digitimes, Chang gave his opinions on both the DRAM and NAND flash market trends and outlook, and outlined Apacer's strategy to respond to the more challenging and diverse memory market.

Q: Would you comment on the DRAM and NAND flash market outlook for the rest of this year?

A: In the DRAM market, demand has started picking up since the third quarter thanks to seasonal factors. On the supply side, chip vendors will have their additional new capacities come online in the fourth quarter. Nevertheless, such supply increase will be gradual and is unlikely to cause a sharp decline in prices.

DRAM contract prices are expected to start falling after November, as a result of suppliers' pricing strategies rather than demand-side factors.

In the NAND flash market, oversupply will persist through the end of 2018. NAND flash prices will remain under downward pressure. Several research firms have predicted that NAND flash prices will fall further in the first half of 2019, due to a seasonal slowdown in end-market demand and also the arrival of new capacity on the supply side.

Prices for consumer SSDs, for example, have halved since the middle of December 2017. Prices for 120GB models have dropped below US$0.20 per gigabyte. Such unreasonable price levels indicate that the supply chain has been flooded by substandard NAND flash chips.

Substandard NAND flash chips could destroy SSDs and cause a certain level of damage to data. Nevertheless, some firms still intend to sell lower-quality SSDs to respond to the continued decline in NAND flash prices. Such development will ultimately disadvantage end consumers.

Q: Would you elaborate on where the supply-demand development is heading in the NAND flash sector?

A: Falling NAND flash prices have been dragging down SSD prices. There is still room for 240GB and higher-capacity SSD prices to fall further, but 120GB SSDs already have no room for further drops.

Prices for 120GB SSDs have fallen about 35% since 2018, while those for 240GB ones have dropped by a larger 50%. The prices are expected to decrease at more moderate paces.

Chip suppliers have gradually improved their production yield rates of 3D TLC NAND chips since 2018. The market for 3D TLC NAND flash will be extremely competitive, which is expected to put prices under further downward pressure in 2019.

NAND flash vendors are planning to expand capacity, with their additional production lines set to come online between November and December. The move is to express their optimism about demand for a variety of applications including those for servers and IoV, which is expected to boom in 2019-2020.

On the other hand, demand for smartphones continues to shrink. The smartphone market growth has decelerated even more. It is also unlikely to see a "killer product" to stimulate smartphone demand in 2019.

A seasonal pick-up in end-market demand will stop NAND flash prices from falling too much in the second half of 2019. Nevertheless, the falling chip prices will help boost the memory content per box for smartphones and other end devices.

Another supply-side issue is that China-based memory firms are gearing up for commercial production of NAND flash chips with their in-house developed process technologies. The industry has been keeping a close eye on their production yields, but how they deal with the substandard chips will be another area the supply chain has to pay attention to given the ongoing problem associated with substandard products in the NAND flash market.

Q: Looking into 2019, will the DRAM market be relatively stable compared to the NAND flash sector?

A: DRAM prices will be relatively stable compared to NAND flash prices in 2019, when DRAM prices are expected to drop at a gradual pace to "reasonable" levels.

DRAM demand will continue to be driven by servers over the next two years. Besides, the availability of 5G technology will be stimulating further DRAM demand. The commercialization of 5G technology is expected to kick off in 2019, when DRAM demand for 5G devices will start emerging.

Q: When will China-based memory chipmakers pose a threat to the existing industry leaders?

A: China intends to aggressively raise the self-sufficiency rate for ICs in the country. The rise of China's semiconductor industry is an inevitable trend.

In the memory sector, Yangtze Memory Technologies (YMTC), Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit and Innotron Memory (known previously as Hefei ChangXin or Hefei RuiLi) are all gearing up for commercial production in 2019. Nevertheless, it remains to be seen whether their in-house developed technologies and production yields are stable and competitive.

It is unlikely to see China-based memory startups play any significant part in the existing memory industry landscape in the short term.

Q: Please share with us Apacer's business strategy for 2019, and the company's growth engines next year.

A: Apacer will be pursuing both revenue and profit growth next year.

Apacer will be expanding further its value-added business consisting of high-ASP solutions for industrial, data center and server applications. In the industrial control field, the company will be striving to meet specific performance, endurance, reliability or value-added needs, while diversifying its offerings for a variety of applications such as cloud computing, transportation, embedded and industrial PC, defense, gaming and medical care.

In the mass-market segment, Apacer will carry on its innovation to optimize user experience and brand value. Price competitions should be avoided.

Apacer continues to promote PC peripherals such as flash drives in emerging countries, where the flash drive market will still be growing over the next 10 years. The company will also be expanding its presence in the Eastern Europe, Middle East and Southeast Asia.

Apacer is also optimistic about memory demand for gaming applications. The performance of SSDs is good enough for gaming devices, but probably not for the DIY sector where HDD remains the primary storage technology.

In the DRAM module field, Apacer will continue to explore new businesses and customers.

Apacer also provides solutions for industrial monitoring applications. The business is still in its early stages.

Q: Can you talk about the new business?

A: The new business focuses on industrial IoT (IIoT) system integration and development. Apacer is promoting its solutions-ready package (SRP) to satisfy the need for real-time remote monitoring and environmental control of poultry farms, water quality monitoring, vehicle light detection, plant factories, and others.

Apacer has provided spectral horticulture illuminometers for use in plant factories operated by China-based Sanan Sino-Science Photobiotech, for example. Apacer with its SRP is also looking to explore more business opportunities in other segments, such as food ingredient testing, water pollution, toxicant analysis and organic analysis.

Apacer with its expertise in storage and focus on industrial products is confident its integrated software, hardware and firmware solutions will better satisfy customer needs in today's smart factories. We expect the new business to generate about 1% of company revenues monthly in the second half of 2019, and the proportion will start growing at a fast pace.



CK Chang, president for Apacer Technology
Photo: Michael Lee, Digitimes, September 2018








    Related topics
    5G



To: Return to Sender who wrote (81291)10/2/2018 5:35:13 PM
From: Gottfried2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Return to Sender
Sr K

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95567
 
bpNDX rose 1 to 63% [TSLA]

Wed Thur Fri Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Mon Tue
Sep19 Sep20 Sep21 Sep24 Sep25 Sep26 Sep27 Sep28 Oct01 Oct02
53 56 56 56 57 61 63 62 62 63













AAL AAL
AAPL AAL AAL AAPL
AAL ADBE AAPL AAPL ADBE
AAPL ADP ADBE ADBE ADP
ADBE ADSK ADP ADP ADSK
ADP ALGN ADSK ADSK ALGN
AAL ADSK ALXN ALGN ALGN ALXN
AAL AAL AAL AAPL ALGN AMGN ALXN ALXN AMGN
AAPL AAPL AAPL ADBE ALXN AMZN AMGN AMGN AMZN
ADBE ADBE ADBE ADP AMGN ATVI AMZN AMZN ATVI
AAL ADP ADP ADP ALGN AMZN AVGO ATVI ATVI AVGO
AAPL ALGN ALGN ALGN ALXN ATVI BIDU AVGO AVGO BIDU
ADBE ALXN ALXN ALXN AMGN AVGO BIIB BIDU BIDU BIIB
ADP AMGN AMGN AMGN AMZN BIDU BKNG BIIB BIIB BKNG
ALGN ATVI ATVI ATVI ATVI BKNG CA BKNG BKNG CA
AMGN AVGO AVGO AVGO AVGO CA CDNS CA CA CDNS
ATVI BIDU BIDU BIDU BIDU CDNS CERN CDNS CDNS CERN
AVGO BKNG BKNG BKNG BKNG CERN CHKP CERN CERN CHKP
BKNG CA CA CA CA CHKP CHTR CHKP CHKP CHTR
CA CDNS CDNS CDNS CDNS CHTR COST CHTR CHTR COST
CDNS CERN CERN CERN CERN COST CSCO COST COST CSCO
CERN CHKP CHKP CHKP CHKP CSCO CSX CSCO CSCO CSX
CHKP CHTR CHTR CHTR CHTR CSX CTAS CSX CSX CTAS
CHTR COST COST COST COST CTAS CTXS CTAS CTAS CTXS
COST CSCO CSCO CSCO CSCO CTXS ESRX CTXS CTXS ESRX
CSCO CSX CSX CSX CSX ESRX EXPE ESRX ESRX EXPE
CSX CTAS CTAS CTAS CTAS EXPE FAST EXPE EXPE FAST
CTAS CTXS CTXS CTXS CTXS FAST FB FAST FAST FB
CTXS ESRX ESRX ESRX ESRX FB FISV FB FB FISV
ESRX EXPE EXPE EXPE EXPE FISV FOXA FISV FISV FOXA
EXPE FAST FAST FAST FAST FOXA GILD FOXA FOXA GILD
FAST FISV FISV FISV FISV GILD GOOGL GILD GILD GOOGL
FISV FOXA FOXA FOXA FOXA GOOGL HAS GOOGL GOOGL HAS
FOXA HAS HAS GILD GILD HAS HOLX HAS HAS HOLX
HAS HOLX HOLX HAS HAS HOLX HSIC HOLX HOLX HSIC
HOLX HSIC HSIC HOLX HOLX HSIC IDXX HSIC HSIC IDXX
HSIC IDXX IDXX HSIC HSIC IDXX ILMN IDXX IDXX ILMN
IDXX ILMN ILMN IDXX IDXX ILMN INCY ILMN ILMN INCY
ILMN INCY INCY ILMN ILMN INCY INTU INCY INCY INTU
INCY INTU INTU INCY INCY INTU ISRG INTU INTU ISRG
INTU ISRG ISRG INTU INTU ISRG MELI ISRG ISRG MELI
ISRG MSFT MSFT ISRG ISRG MELI MSFT MELI MELI MSFT
MSFT NFLX NFLX MSFT MSFT MSFT NFLX MSFT MSFT NFLX
NFLX NTES NTES NFLX NFLX NFLX NTES NFLX NFLX NTES
NTES NVDA NVDA NTES NTES NTES ORLY NTES NTES NVDA
NVDA ORLY ORLY ORLY ORLY ORLY PAYX NVDA NVDA ORLY
ORLY PAYX PAYX PAYX PAYX PAYX PCAR ORLY ORLY PAYX
PAYX PCAR PCAR PCAR PCAR PCAR PYPL PAYX PAYX PCAR
PCAR PYPL PYPL PYPL PYPL PYPL QCOM PCAR PCAR QCOM
PYPL QCOM QCOM QCOM QCOM QCOM REGN QCOM QCOM REGN
QCOM ROST ROST ROST ROST ROST ROST REGN REGN ROST
ROST SHPG SHPG SHPG SHPG SHPG SHPG ROST ROST SHPG
SHPG SIRI SIRI SIRI SIRI SIRI SIRI SHPG SHPG SIRI
SIRI SNPS SNPS SNPS SNPS SNPS SNPS SIRI SIRI SNPS
SNPS TMUS TMUS TMUS TMUS TMUS TMUS SNPS SNPS TMUS
TMUS TSLA TSLA TSLA TSLA TSLA TSLA TMUS TMUS TSLA
TTWO TTWO TTWO TTWO TTWO TTWO TTWO TTWO TTWO TTWO
ULTA ULTA ULTA ULTA ULTA ULTA ULTA ULTA ULTA ULTA
VOD VOD VOD VOD VOD VOD VOD VOD VOD VOD
VRSK VRSK VRSK VRSK VRSK VRSK VRSK VRSK VRSK VRSK
VRTX VRTX VRTX VRTX VRTX VRTX VRTX VRTX VRTX VRTX
WBA WBA WBA WBA WBA WBA WBA WBA WBA WBA
XLNX XLNX XLNX XLNX XLNX XLNX XLNX XLNX XLNX XLNX



To: Return to Sender who wrote (81291)10/2/2018 6:24:27 PM
From: Return to Sender  Respond to of 95567
 
53% Downside Volume on the NYSE - 59% Downside Volume on the NASDAQ:

wsj.com

Tuesday, October 02, 2018
Notice to readers: As of 3/3/11, Closing ARMS Index (TRIN) calculation is based on composite data. Click here for historical data prior to 3/3/11.
NYSE Latest close Previous close Week ago
Issues traded 3,093 3,091 3,071
Advances 1,178 1,215 1,308
Declines 1,801 1,794 1,650
Unchanged 114 82 113
New highs 43 92 78
New lows 148 156 149
Adv. volume* 377,118,455 420,875,903 367,528,518
Decl. volume* 415,242,635 356,429,922 453,684,813
Total volume* 805,871,156 786,448,215 831,213,525
Closing tick +8 +20 +119
Closing Arms (TRIN)† 0.76 0.53 0.93
Block trades* 7,323 6,718 6,753
Adv. volume 1,519,162,069 1,840,494,978 1,479,599,473
Decl. volume 1,763,041,370 1,435,221,540 1,733,278,019
Total volume 3,339,753,672 3,309,355,058 3,253,480,412
Nasdaq Latest close Previous close Week ago
Issues traded 3,137 3,151 3,151
Advances 959 1,063 1,491
Declines 2,076 1,997 1,485
Unchanged 102 91 175
New highs 42 124 84
New lows 135 98 59
Closing tick -68 +377 +479
Closing Arms (TRIN)† 0.69 0.70 0.85
Block trades 10,022 9,496 10,152
Adv. volume 924,030,636 959,351,282 1,210,607,904
Decl. volume 1,388,476,884 1,254,428,814 1,026,126,077
Total volume 2,343,471,285 2,236,841,371 2,272,844,511
NYSE American Latest close Previous close Week ago
Issues traded 311 319 311
Advances 143 144 128
Declines 154 154 157
Unchanged 14 21 26
New highs 10 9 8
New lows 7 5 22
Adv. volume* 23,383,876 16,034,591 14,695,790
Decl. volume* 6,105,148 6,726,785 8,492,034
Total volume* 29,795,603 22,907,204 23,591,497
Closing tick -10 -8 +21
Closing Arms (TRIN)† 0.18 0.26 0.36
Block trades* 157 144 233
Adv. volume 301,625,288 212,773,900 178,146,444
Decl. volume 57,728,419 59,932,560 78,772,957
Total volume 361,324,438 273,600,058 260,426,163
NYSE Arca Latest close Previous close Week ago
Issues traded 1,347 1,357 1,339
Advances 471 727 662
Declines 854 607 646
Unchanged 22 23 31
New highs 15 77 30
New lows 30 51 30
Adv. volume* 111,447,890 143,745,088 115,511,621
Decl. volume* 127,684,217 74,910,672 59,160,307
Total volume* 249,864,239 219,026,355 177,403,532
Closing tick -41 -13 -59
Closing Arms (TRIN)† 0.67 0.73 0.63
Block trades* 1,546 1,358 1,158
Adv. volume 475,399,888 624,315,896 499,482,829
Decl. volume 579,769,416 379,506,005 305,723,556
Total volume 1,107,170,780 1,009,611,957 820,526,169

*Primary market NYSE, NYSE American or NYSE Arca only. †Compares the ratio of advancing to declining issues with the ratio of volume of shares rising and falling. Arms Index or TRIN = (advancing issues / declining issues) / (composite volume of advancing issues / composite volume of declining issues.) Generally, an Arms of less than 1.00 indicates buying demand; above 1.00 indicates selling pressure.














RtS



To: Return to Sender who wrote (81291)10/3/2018 11:30:01 PM
From: Return to Sender  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95567
 
61% Upside Volume on the NYSE - 71% Upside Volume on the NASDAQ:

wsj.com

Nice upside volume on both the NYSE and NASDAQ but the number of new lows rising as the market tries to make new highs is worrisome. I still think the market has another melt up in it but with the FED raising rates in my humble opinion we will eventually see a major sell off after the yield curve inverts. RtS

Wednesday, October 03, 2018
Notice to readers: As of 3/3/11, Closing ARMS Index (TRIN) calculation is based on composite data. Click here for historical data prior to 3/3/11.
NYSE Latest close Previous close Week ago
Issues traded 3,091 3,093 3,072
Advances 1,475 1,178 1,091
Declines 1,527 1,801 1,858
Unchanged 89 114 123
New highs 73 43 60
New lows 262 148 111
Adv. volume* 514,970,618 377,118,455 234,364,535
Decl. volume* 330,994,087 415,242,635 584,409,303
Total volume* 871,667,021 805,871,156 826,824,217
Closing tick +33 +8 -86
Closing Arms (TRIN)† 0.57 0.76 1.51
Block trades* 7,372 7,323 6,794
Adv. volume 2,155,495,450 1,519,162,069 929,388,585
Decl. volume 1,280,274,889 1,763,041,370 2,393,084,411
Total volume 3,543,821,000 3,339,753,672 3,354,289,463
Nasdaq Latest close Previous close Week ago
Issues traded 3,160 3,137 3,146
Advances 1,899 959 1,116
Declines 1,166 2,076 1,898
Unchanged 95 102 132
New highs 49 42 79
New lows 111 135 77
Closing tick +142 -68 -469
Closing Arms (TRIN)† 0.66 0.69 0.82
Block trades 20,436 10,022 11,160
Adv. volume 2,130,073,523 924,030,636 944,465,817
Decl. volume 859,707,718 1,388,476,884 1,318,889,222
Total volume 3,005,471,131 2,343,471,285 2,287,199,408
NYSE American Latest close Previous close Week ago
Issues traded 312 311 311
Advances 156 143 118
Declines 144 154 177
Unchanged 12 14 16
New highs 5 10 6
New lows 16 7 13
Adv. volume* 10,969,187 23,383,876 6,388,682
Decl. volume* 9,677,530 6,105,148 8,142,381
Total volume* 20,693,169 29,795,603 15,434,406
Closing tick +48 -10 -10
Closing Arms (TRIN)† 0.81 0.18 0.65
Block trades* 158 157 141
Adv. volume 142,330,026 301,625,288 93,422,351
Decl. volume 105,852,618 57,728,419 91,665,549
Total volume 248,514,093 361,324,438 185,923,544
NYSE Arca Latest close Previous close Week ago
Issues traded 1,375 1,347 1,349
Advances 649 471 606
Declines 706 854 717
Unchanged 20 22 26
New highs 48 15 33
New lows 109 30 16
Adv. volume* 136,300,988 111,447,890 119,009,567
Decl. volume* 154,513,830 127,684,217 146,174,761
Total volume* 291,402,416 249,864,239 266,112,538
Closing tick -17 -41 -62
Closing Arms (TRIN)† 1.08 0.67 1.05
Block trades* 2,222 1,546 1,527
Adv. volume 562,204,988 475,399,888 493,080,456
Decl. volume 658,278,754 579,769,416 615,065,950
Total volume 1,224,755,484 1,107,170,780 1,111,956,542

*Primary market NYSE, NYSE American or NYSE Arca only. †Compares the ratio of advancing to declining issues with the ratio of volume of shares rising and falling. Arms Index or TRIN = (advancing issues / declining issues) / (composite volume of advancing issues / composite volume of declining issues.) Generally, an Arms of less than 1.00 indicates buying demand; above 1.00 indicates selling pressure.














RtS