Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Nanoviricides - The Other Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: drkaz who wrote (945)	10/2/2018 10:44:39 AM
From: Its_lose_not_loose	Respond to of 1010

Ewwww-weee, look at the language the kind doctor uses when let out of the playpen. Nothing's been new with NNVC for 13 years, but that didn't stop you and your horde of morons from spewing bullshit for the same period of time. Admit it, you bet on a losing horse. There's no shame in it but there is a lot of shame in betting on that horse after it's gone lame. Grow a set, already.

To: drkaz who wrote (945)	10/2/2018 10:48:59 AM
From: Its_lose_not_loose	Respond to of 1010

Interesting to see you posted a reply within minutes after I posted. Good to know you still have a strong attraction to my board where the truth hurts but at least it's the truth. Not like the bilge you promulgate on your boards.

To: drkaz who wrote (945)	2/2/2019 11:42:13 AM
From: arvitar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1010

Serious question: What compels you bagholders to baghold for 100% losses? Even ignoring the fact that any non-retard could see this was a scam from the start... It's been clear for several years now that Seymour and Diwan were incapable of raising further funds, while Diwan continued to siphon of millions of dollars every quarter. It's certainly clear now that this POS is dead. Yet you all continue to baghold with your mouths hanging open. Why is that?