Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Zentek Ltd. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David R. who wrote (17260)

10/10/2018 12:26:34 PM

From: Wayverider1

7 Recommendations

Recommended By
Ace/Ten
Antlizzie
Canseco
David R.
Gunther.Vivid

and 2 more members

Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 54497

Our Board members have their work cut out for them. Can you imagine if the Gizmodo article had stated:

“All of the graphene they analyzed was trash—their lab analysis from 60 companies found that all of the supposed “graphene” actually contains less than 50 percent graphene content, a third of the companies had less than 10 percent graphene content, and usually, the analyzed fakes had anywhere between 10 and 1,000 layers. And while graphene should be 100 percent carbon, most of the samples were contaminated.” … all except one small Canadian company: Zenyatta Graphene, the lone exception....

If the above statement had been published in the article, or even if its currently true (but largely unknown within the greater market), its just a matter of marketing and providing bulk samples, in conjunction with waiting for the graphene market to further evolve and mature (quietly hopeful that 'Austin' will open some doors).