SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (98517)10/14/2018 1:24:18 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 365385
 
That isn't what they say:
>>There’s a lot to unravel in Trump’s comment, and too much remains unknown to put it on the Truth-O-Meter.<<
And you are talking about a James O'Keefe video. JoK is a known liar who edits his videos in deeply misleading ways in addition to setting people up. O'Keefe is getting sued for this. Again. What a guy.

Figures you would refer to something that guy did. Birds of a feather for sure.

Here is what wiki says about the episode:

Creamer stepped down from his consulting position with the Democratic National Committee in October 2016 after a video released by James O'Keefe's Project Veritas included undercover footage of a subcontractor to his firm discussing a scheme to pay people to incite violence at rallies for the Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. [5] [6] [7] The footage showed a Project Veritas operative posing as a potential donor, discussing fraudulent voting arrangements. Creamer did not endorse the methods discussed and voiced concern to the potential donor that these efforts would be tantamount to voter fraud. [8] The subcontractor was immediately fired. [9] Creamer and Democratic Party spokespeople subsequently described the conversations as "hypothetical" and denied that the tactics described had been used. [6] In June 2017, Creamer, and Democracy Partners filed a lawsuit against O'Keefe and his organization, Project Veritas, seeking a million dollars in damages for various violations of DC and Federal law. The case is currently pending in Federal Court in Washington, DC. [10]



To: i-node who wrote (98517)10/14/2018 2:00:14 PM
From: combjelly2 Recommendations

Recommended By
bentway
Ron

  Respond to of 365385
 
Right. Based on Project Veritas video. Which has a long and unbroken history of deceptively editing videos.

If that is your proof, you have none.