Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DavidG who wrote (26626)	1/16/1998 4:35:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 53903

david, first of all, nobody knew what you were saying b/c you never specified as i've asked you to do several times. you just mention "cost" like it has meaning. it doesn't. reread what i wrote, it answers your questions. you can look at the muei report and subtract out what you need to as i did with earnings. now read slooooowwwwwllllyyyyy... we know muei made a profit. if muei made a profit and mu gets 66% of that profit, please explain for all how muei took money from mu's bottom line (pssst, they actually added money in ;-). mu can have a gross cost of $3 and still lose $0.20 next q with an asp of 30% higher than their costs - so what is your point discussing gross cost? net income is much more important than gross income. that is why when earnings are reported they report NET INCOME and not gross income. you are still looking for a guarantee of the future. there isn't one. you'll never find it. skeets.