SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (144160)11/5/2018 6:56:42 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218631
 
Hmnnnn ... interesting, to prospect and cut out the middlemen, and get to the next level, since especially the unwelcome that must greet ethnic Chinese in Silicon Valley... let’s see how it all goes ...

ft.com

US fears attempts by Chinese chipmakers to grab top talentWashington’s moves against Fujian Jinhua lift lid on battle to recruit top engineers

A chip made by Taiwan-based Micron. There are now about 1,000 Taiwanese engineers working in Chinese chip companies © BloombergThis was a week of reckoning for Fujian Jinhua. First, the US government put the Chinese semiconductor company on an export control blacklist. Then it filed charges against the company for allegedly stealing technology from US memory chipmaker Micron.

But Washington was also making a broader point. “We are here to say that enough is enough,” said Jeff Sessions, the US attorney-general.

Fujian Jinhua is accused of luring two Micron employees with the promise of higher salaries and on the condition that they bring key process technology with them.

According to court documents and Taiwanese investigators, United Microelectronics Corporation, a Taiwanese contract chipmaker which had entered a co-operation agreement with Fujian Jinhua, poached the two engineers at Micron Memory Taiwan, one of its subsidiaries, and passed everything they brought on to its Chinese partner.

Fujian Jinhua did respond to requests for comment.

UMC said the allegations in the indictment were virtually the same as in Micron’s previous civil complaint, and pointed to the fact that it had suspended its R&D co-operation with Fujian Jinhua after the export ban was imposed. “UMC regrets that the US Attorney’s Office brought these charges without first notifying UMC and giving it an opportunity to discuss the matter,” the company said on Friday.



Signs of US-China trade tensions easing

The case is just the latest example of a battle China has been fighting for many years to lure leading expertise in a bid to achieve a set of technology sector goals, such as building a world-class semiconductor industry. Under the Thousand Talents Plan, a programme set up 10 years ago by Beijing, China wants to recruit top science and engineering experts from abroad to help as part of its Made in China 2025 project to build world-leading capacity in key sectors. That has fuelled concerns in the US over technology theft and forced technology transfer.“If we are in an economic war with China, it’s a war for talent,” said a US diplomat in Asia.

Taiwan’s semiconductor companies — many of which are contract manufacturers that make chips designed in the US and elsewhere and have the leading-edge process technology Chinese companies still struggle to master — have been a prime target.

Employees in our companies are easier to lure — we speak the same language, we share the same culture

Su Tzu-yun, Institute for National Defence and Security Research
While Fujian Jinhua was poaching the MMT engineers, two engineers from Inotera, another Micron affiliate in Taiwan, joined Tsinghua Unigroup, leading Taiwanese investigators to allege that technology was illegally transferred as well.

Tsinghua Unigroup did not respond to a request for comment.

Two years earlier, Tsinghua had unsuccessfully approached Micron with a takeover offer. Yangtze Memory Technologies, a Tsinghua subsidiary, has since become China’s leading maker of Nand Flash memory, a key data storage medium.

In another case, Taiwanese prosecutors have accused two former engineers from Taiwanese speciality chipmaker Win Semiconductors and chip foundry Wavetek respectively of having stolen their former employers’ technology when transferring to Chengdu Gastone, another Chinese chip company.

Chengdu Gastone did not respond to a request for comment.

“Employees in our companies are easier to lure — we speak the same language, we share the same culture,” said Su Tzu-yun, a senior official at the Institute for National Defence and Security Research, a think-tank backed by Taiwan’s defence ministry and National Security Council.

As early as 2000, Richard Chang, a former Texas Instruments executive, quit Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, the world’s largest contract chipmaker, to set up Semiconductor Manufacturing International, a rival outfit in China. Although Mr Chang left SMIC when the company lost a lawsuit over stealing TSMC’s trade secrets nine years later, his company is now China’s largest chipmaker.

The country’s pull for chip experts from across the strait and elsewhere also appears to have become irresistible. Over the past three years alone, scores of engineers from Taiwanese chipmakers have joined Chinese semiconductor businesses. In several cases, there have been accusations that they took technology with them.

In addition, Beijing is fine-tuning its policy measures: instead of just wooing Taiwanese companies as it has done for more than 20 years, it now has a number of incentives to lure individual Taiwanese citizens to study, research and work in China.

“Overall there are about 1,000 Taiwanese engineers working in Chinese chip companies now,” said Lin Jian-hong, a semiconductor analyst at Trendforce, an industry research house in Taipei.

Recommended
Some of these are believed to be stationed at Chinese state-owned companies temporarily under agreements with Taiwanese chipmakers that help run those China-based fabrication plants. “But given that companies have entered such deals, it is clear that this is happening on an individual basis as well,” said Mr Lin.

But government officials and industry executives say Japan and South Korea are affected too.

“It is a big concern for us that technology is flowing to Chinese companies — via Taiwan, but also via our own engineers who are hired directly,” said a Japanese security official.

An executive in a South Korean technology company and one of the country’s diplomats said the number of engineers in its semiconductor companies poached by Chinese rivals was rising rapidly.

According to government officials and industry executives in the affected countries, Chinese companies are targeting two groups of engineers: senior industry veterans in their 40s and 50s who have in-depth knowledge of current manufacturing processes; and very young talent just out of university.

“For those in their 40s and 50s, it is a no-brainer: they get offered the same figure salary but in Rmb instead of NT$, which means four times as much,” said an executive at TSMC.

The South Korean diplomat confirmed the same pattern for engineers being poached from companies such as Samsung. “They get the chance to make the money they need to put their kids through university and have a cushion for retirement, but faster than they would be at home,” he said.

Jumping ship
Some recent hires of senior Taiwanese chip executives by Chinese companies

October 2015

Tsinghua Unigroup, a Chinese state-backed chipmaker, hires Charles Kau, former head of Inotera, Micron’s joint-venture in Taiwan who had also worked at Fairchild Semiconductor, Intel, TSMC and Macronix.

December 2016

Semiconductor Manufacturing International (SMIC), a Chinese chipmaker founded by a former Taiwanese semiconductor executive, hires Chiang Shang-yi, a retired veteran R&D executive at TSMC, the world’s largest contract chipmaker.

January 2017

Tsinghua Unigroup hires Sun Shih-wei, former chief executive and deputy chairman of United Microelectronics, Taiwan’s second-largest contract chipmaker.

October 2017

SMIC hires Liang Mong-song, another former TSMC senior executive, from Samsung.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (144160)11/6/2018 10:25:16 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218631
 
Let us see whether ‘free-trade’ survives, when a buyer wishes to buy, and a seller shoes from selling

asia.nikkei.com

China upgrades nuclear reactors to wean itself off coalAdvanced designs use homegrown and foreign technology as West looks on warily
November 04, 2018 12:03 JST

BEIJING -- China's state-owned power plant operators are introducing safer, more efficient nuclear reactors as the government looks to raise its nuclear power capacity by 50% by 2020 to reduce its reliance on coal.

So-called generation III plus reactors have safety features that automatically shut down the unit if the power is cut off. At least three advanced reactors will be operating in China by the end of the year, and more are on the way.

In Zhejiang Province, China National Nuclear Power, a unit of China National Nuclear Corp., began commercial power generation of its Sanmen-1 reactor in September, becoming the first company in the world to operate an AP1000 pressurized water reactor designed by Westinghouse Electric of the U.S.

Construction began in 2009. In April, the reactor received regulatory approval and was loaded with fuel. The 1,250 megawatt reactor was hooked up to the grid in June and was test run for 168 consecutive hours.

State Power Investment Corp.'s Haiyang plant in Shandong Province also has a Westinghouse AP1000 reactor, which began trial runs in August. Last month the advanced 1,250 MW reactor was declared ready for commercial operation. Eventually the power station will have six AP1000 reactors.



China General Nuclear Power Group's Taishan-1 in Guangdong Province is a European-type pressurized water reactor, or EPR, designed by French company Areva. The reactor was successfully powered up in June and trial runs are underway. If they go as planned, 1,750 MW plant will begin commercial operation by the end of the year.

According to China's National Energy Administration, more than 40 nuclear reactors are operating in the country, with a total capacity of 38,000 MW as of the end of August. Although that represents a near tripling of China's nuclear capacity compared with just five years earlier, nuclear power still accounted for less than 4% of the country's total output in 2017, while coal-fired plants had a 70%-plus share.

China's President Xi Jinping aims to raise the country's nuclear power output to 58,000 MW by around 2020, and to 150,000 MW by 2030, which would make it the world's biggest generator of nuclear power, ahead of the U.S. If it reaches that goal, nuclear power will grow to 8% of China's forecast electricity output.

Beijing is keen to develop its own nuclear reactor technology. Its Hualong One is a domestic version of the pressurized water reactor design, which it developed through its experience building and operating plants in China. It also incorporates technologies from overseas.



Even as China applies itself to developing nuclear power, the German and U.S. governments are wary of cooperating too closely, despite the business opportunities, due to concerns over technology leaks and possible military applications.

Plans are underway to build a number of Hualong One reactors, including at the Fuqing power plant in Fujian Province in China's southeast, and at the Fangchenggang nuclear project in the Guangxi-Zhuang Autonomous Region. China is also promoting exports of its homegrown advanced reactor in the U.K., Pakistan and elsewhere.

The U.S. Department of Energy in October announced new restrictions on exports of civilian nuclear technology to China. The German government in August blocked an attempt by Yantai Taihai Group, a metalworking and chemical company based in China's Shandong Province, to buy German precision equipment maker Leifeld Metal Spinning, whose machines can be used to fabricate nuclear plant components.

Although the new U.S. rules will not affect Westinghouse's AP1000 projects in China, Chinese companies hoping to use new American technology will have to offer more transparency about how it will be used.

Striking a balance between security and commercial interests will also be challenging for Washington. According to Chinese news outlets, U.S. exports to China of nuclear equipment totaled $170 million in 2017, making it the second-largest buyer of U.S. products after the U.K.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (144160)11/6/2018 11:06:54 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218631
 
Am pondering whether trade battles, econo conflicts, and cold wars are less costly or easier to lose than hot wars

And what would the casualties look like, how, where and when

Should not have to wait 18 years to know the answers, and suspect far more costly than a trillion

bloomberg.com

Trump Faced Iran Sanctions Rebellion From Allies on the Right
Nick WadhamsNovember 6, 2018, 10:23 PM GMT+8
Further cuts in imports of Iranian oil will be harder: analyst

As the U.S. prepared to impose new sanctions against Iran’s energy and banking sectors, senior Trump administration officials faced an internal rebellion from conservatives who accused them of being too weak toward the Islamic Republic.

That 11th-hour rupture sent officials at the departments of State and Treasury rushing last week to reassure normally steadfast political allies and harden their messaging on the sanctions announced Monday against 700 banks, individuals and other entities, according to three people familiar with the discussions.

Opposition to Trump’s sanctions strategy -- particularly the decisions to issue temporary oil waivers to eight countries and how aggressively to target Iranian ties to global financial networks -- arose most prominently from a handful of Republican senators and National Security Adviser John Bolton, according to the people.

Trump justified the decision to issue waivers, telling reporters Monday that “we want to go a little bit slower because I don’t want to drive the oil prices in the world up. It would cause a shock to the market.”

Read More: U.S. Vows Pain to Companies Found Evading Iran Sanctions

That approach worked, with crude prices declining over the past several weeks as reports of waivers leaked into the energy market. But the last-minute pressure and the administration’s response could have lasting ramifications.

For one thing, the administration will be hard-pressed to justify extensions to the waivers when they come up for review in another 180 days. Recipients are supposed to use the waiver period to make significant progress cutting Iranian oil imports, which have already been reduced by about one million barrels per day since May.

“You take a million barrels out of the market, that’s a lot,” said Kevin Book, managing director of Washington-based consultancy ClearView Energy Partners. “But the next million, million and a half, may not be easy and it could be impossible.”

A National Security Council spokesman declined to comment on internal deliberations.

There were two major points of contention as the clock ticked toward Nov. 5, the day that the sanctions would snap back. One was how many countries should get so-called Special Reduction Exemptions to keep importing Iranian oil. The other was how hard to pressure Swift, the Brussels-based financial messaging service that’s crucial to the global movement of money, to cut off Iranian banks. Hardliners argued for a complete break, while others within the administration wanted a looser approach.

Read a QuickTake on how the U.S. can force the world to pressure Iran

One person familiar with the deliberations said the concern among some officials at Treasury was that kicking all Iranian banks off the messaging service would only further alienate European allies -- who wanted to sustain ties with Iran -- and shut the door on financial transactions related to food and medicine.

All through the process, Secretary of State Michael Pompeo and his team had to address competing interests. If they offered too many loopholes they’d be accused of being weak on Iran. If they clamped down so hard that oil prices spiked and gas prices in the U.S. jumped, they’d infuriate the president and possibly hand a campaign talking point to Democrats on the eve of the congressional midterms.

The State Department had to fend off a last-minute challenge to its planning process last week when Dan Brouillette, the deputy energy secretary, sent a memo to the department objecting to the decision to grant waivers and saying the administration should take a tougher line against Iran, one of the people said.

Officials at the Energy and State departments didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment about the internal deliberations. A Treasury spokesman declined to comment.

Waivers DebateMore significantly, displeasure over the measures reached into the White House. According to the three people familiar with the matter, National Security Adviser Bolton felt that the oil waivers especially were too lenient. The waivers also prompted conservative U.S. critics of the administration’s approach -- including Republican Senators Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz -- to say the White House was caving in on its tough line and to vow legislation to close what they consider loopholes.

“Sanctions waivers being given to key purchasers of Iranian oil, most alarmingly China, give Iran a financial reprieve, and should be eliminated as soon as possible,” Rubio said in a press release on Friday. Cruz said it was important that “final policy imposes maximum pressure” on Tehran.

The criticism was more blunt from United Against Nuclear Iran, an outside group chaired by former Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman that has advocated a tough stance.

‘They Caved’“Widespread waivers granted under Iran sanctions. Whatever happened to maximum pressure? They caved. Big time,” read a Nov. 2 tweet from UANI.

The criticism put Pompeo on the defensive in an interview on Fox News Sunday, when he was asked repeatedly to explain the decision to issue waivers.

“I’ve been at this a long time,” Pompeo said. “No one’s going to argue that Secretary Pompeo isn’t tough on Iran, and no one is going to argue that President Trump isn’t doing the same.”

When Mnuchin spoke to reporters on Nov. 2, he was explicit that Swift risked being punished unless it disconnected any Iranian banks designated for sanctions.

At the same time, the State Department has declined to say how much it will require countries to reduce oil exports to keep getting waivers. It’s also refused to say how much they’ll be allowed to import. One of the people familiar with the discussions said the administration would demand more than the 20 percent reductions the Obama administration required for new waivers.

“I believe the Trump administration would not be satisfied with 20 percent more over the next six months,” said Mark Dubowitz, chief executive of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a Washington-based nonpartisan policy institute. “They still want to get to zero.”

Advertisement

Scroll to continue with content

By the end, the shift to a more aggressive strategy from Pompeo and Mnuchin seemed to work -- at least for the time being.

Stepping away from its earlier criticism, Lieberman’s group praised the sanctions. Even Bolton, who had been silent on the matter since late last week, did a media appearance on Fox News on Monday to underscore the seriousness of his intent to strangle Iran’s economy.

“I think we’ve said for a long time that zero should mean zero,” Bolton said. “We’re going to do everything we can to squeeze Iran hard -- as the British say, to squeeze them until the pips squeak.”