SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: P.T.Burnem who wrote (45799)1/16/1998 1:59:00 PM
From: Jim Lamb  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Real time quotes free fyi
pan.digitrade.com



To: P.T.Burnem who wrote (45799)1/16/1998 2:43:00 PM
From: Randy Ellingson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
The idea that Intel can make business apps such as OODB's run faster by adding 70 new MMX instructions is laughable. That said, I have little doubt that Intel will continue to dominate the high end of the x86 market. The problem is that low-end x86 CPU's are perfectly adequate for running the vast majority of today's PC applications. Also, for the average PC buyer, more memory is a better investment than a faster CPU.

I have little doubt that the applications requiring high-end processors (and next generation and thereafter processors) will continue to arrive. If the entertainment world goes digital, processing power and speed in general will be needed as much as it is when you wish your PC would search your HD faster. You can tell me the bottleneck isn't the processor, but it's faster to do many things on a computer that has a faster processor.

Randy



To: P.T.Burnem who wrote (45799)1/16/1998 2:48:00 PM
From: BlueCrab  Respond to of 186894
 
PT -- <<The problem is that low-end x86 CPU's are perfectly adequate for running the vast majority of today's PC applications.>>

You included a very crucial word in your statement. Can you guess which word it is?<G>

Best,

Jeff