Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sylvester80 who wrote (1098745)	11/12/2018 5:09:41 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Respond to of 1578303

Sylvester80, But you have no problem with POS tRump invoking a constitutional crisis, right? You're too much of a dumbass to understand, but I'll give you a nuanced answer anyway, just for posterity. It can be argued that the 14th amendment should not apply to anchor babies, i.e. those who come here illegally or temporarily just for the sole purpose of birthing naturalized American citizens. I personally don't agree. Moreover, I see nothing in the 14th amendment, either explicitly or implied, that justifies adding such a restriction. We've gone for over 100 years using the literal interpretation of the 14th amendment. Not even the old Trumpster can overturn that much precedent, at least not without a new amendment. Tenchusatsu