SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: angel who wrote (2195)1/16/1998 4:02:00 PM
From: tech  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3391
 
In response to your post.

exchange2000.com

>> I think the problems here are all because of phone calls we have made. I call NASDAQ and because I do not have a tape I can play back to everyone Tech goes on and on about me being a lier. << -angel

The point is not whether you called NASDAQ or not, the point is what you said they told you. You "claimed" that the specifically told you that NO company with a open review would be approved.

This is NOT TRUE. When I called I specifically asked if anyone at NASDAQ would make such a claim, they said no. When Kevin Hansen called he wasn't told that either.

I have gotten several emails from others who called and my investment advisor even called and no one was told anything like what you say.

It was very clear that just because the NASD has a review it was not, by itself, a disqualification for NASDAQ.

Furthermore, you then tried to say that CSGI had filed for NASDAQ once before and had gotten turned down. WHICH WAS UNTRUE.

Remember, that was when you decided not to post for a few days.

You have consistently posted false information on this thread.



To: angel who wrote (2195)1/16/1998 5:30:00 PM
From: tech  Respond to of 3391
 
in response to your post # 2197

>> "On November 10, 1997, the Company issued to a consultant of the Company warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per
share. The warrants were issued to the consultant in consideration of services rendered to the
Company <<

>> This consultant keeps appearing in all the different filings. Who is this person and what does he do to keep getting warrants to purchase so many shares? << -angel

If you had bothered to look at the bottom of the 10Q, you would of seen this:

4.11 Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to a consultant's
designee, Irvington International Limited, in November,
1997.(3)

Furthermore, you said this consultant keeps appearing in all the different filings"

If you had no idea who it was, how in the hell would you know what filings and how many times they appeared ? Oh, was that another conjecture on your part ?

Michael Block provided you with the number to ConSyGen's attorney. Why don't you just pick up the phone and ask him, or call the company and ask them why they gave warrants to a particular consultant.