Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (29883)	1/16/1998 2:38:00 PM
From: go4it	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Bill, This may come as a real big surprise to you but the so called cheer leaders have banned together in order to perform the necassary DD and I know people that i trust who have performed tests on their own. That is another story. I was blind sided by the non-commercial process but I am confident that the metals are there and there in very large quantities. So what does that prove ? You aren't going to believe me any more than you will the company so we are back to square one. The only way you will be satisfied is to perform the tests yourself so stop whining about it and go do it.

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (29883)	1/16/1998 3:16:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Bill, Yes exchanges have lists of assay labs they will accept. The question is how you handle technological advance. Technological advance does occur. I understand both positions in this. The ASE has seen a LOT of fraud. They want to be very conservative in their approach. Naxos claims they have a technological advance. They wish to find a lab to analyze the technological advance and then do assays if they sign of on the method. This is the essence of the impass between the ASE and Naxos. Both have a valid point of view. It is your and my job as informed investors and thinking human beings to evaluate each position and determine whether the parties involved are reputable. I've done a lot of due diligence on this. I have spoken to many people in the mining industry, very few of them are associated with the dirts. The reputation of Ledoux is very good. BD also. I have checked out various comments I have heard about Dr Johnson's process and appears possible. On this basis I have chosen to trust Ledoux and based on what we have heard so far invest in Naxos. As in all risky investments I have practiced diversification. Each of us has to evaluate the information. I choose to rely on my own due diligence as opposed to an exchanges's caution.