Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spekulatius who wrote (61449)	11/12/2018 1:56:42 AM
From: bruwin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78666

I would agree that there's nothing wrong with MHK .... If one looks at the company's Annuals .... 1) Operating Revenue has increased regularly for the past 5 years ... 2) EBITDA has increased regularly for the past 5 years, AND the latest EBITDA/Revenue = 1796/9491 = ~19% 3) Cost of Debt decreasing regularly 4) Pretax Income has increased regularly for the past 5 years 5) Net Income has increased regularly for the past 5 years, and latest NI/Revenue = 971/9491 = ~10% And if we look at "Retained Earnings" (6) on the Balance Sheet we see a healthy ongoing increase due to positive contributions from Net Incomes ... BUT then, we look at MHK's chart ..... ..... and we see an ongoing fall off in its stock's price ..... Well, IMO, when negative "Technical Analysis (TA)" clashes with positive, factual "Fundamental Analysis (FA)" then my money is on MHK ..... I don't like to put the Cart (TA) before the Horse (FA) ...... (unless there's some Major Negative aspect within that company that is not publicly known)