SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (1100278)11/17/2018 12:50:38 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579130
 
Wisdom is knowing what you are stupid about. Any opinion one expresses conveys elements of that persons wisdom.

I define a scientist as one how truly understands what science is. And that includes knowing what to look at what is known and unknown to know what is rational, possible, silly, ignorant, stupid in confirming or denying any science hypothesis.

My decades of asking how does it really work and using all manner of instruments to personally measure and verify measurements traceable to national standards, AKA calibrations, including my analysis of thousands of hours on the speculations about a 1 part in 10,000 increase in CO2 and it supposed OH MY GOD impact on climate have led me to the conclusion that fear of or belief in temperature changes beyond the change in mass of CO2 divided by the (mass of H20 times 250 + CO2) times 33 suggest basic fundamental science incomprehension and disqualifies any persons claim to be a scientist.

What is the energy in a black body spectrum CO2 can absorb vs what H20 can absorb.
What ratio black body radiation they both can absorb.

What is the ratio on Part per 10,000 of CO2 vs H20 at various dewpoints.

If one can understand the a 10 percent grey filter absorbs 10% and adding filters make the total absorption simple ( 100 * .1 )(+ 90 * .1)( + 80 * .1).... (100-n * .1)

then one can see why my test of who is a scientist is a valid common sense test.

Or degree of certainty of of CO2 catastrpphic global warming is proportional to science stupidity or dishonesty for unknown motives.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (1100278)11/17/2018 5:39:23 PM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1579130
 
One study on the rate of ocean warming does not a concensus make. They drivel full of polemics is pure tRumptardian garbage