Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (388873)	11/18/2018 11:25:13 AM
From: koan	Respond to of 541006

It was about the science which I think is there and i guess you don't? Even science has disagreements. So I saw we were done with that and pivoted to a soft anecdotal argument as my last attempt. John, I think the science is pretty clear, not necessarily with regard to any specific difference, but of "differences in general'. I think the science is clear and the logic is clear, e.g.. 1) As one author observed, they know there is a direct path in animals, but weren't sure about us. I think he is down playing that argument because we too are an animal, so it would be logical we would have the same direct pathways. 2) Science has proved some differences and so that shows there are differences and then one can apply anecdotal evidence to make guesstimates. Which is what I have done. JMHO. <,Message #388873 from JohnM at 11/18/2018 9:02:32 AM Yep, we've run this string out. But, just to take one more cut. This reply is about gender differences. Not my argument. In fact, I agree with your observation and have much the same experience. I had assumed our argument was about explanations rather than observations. But it's reasonably clear we disagree at that level.