Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (43659)	1/16/1998 4:40:00 PM
From: Linda Pearson	Respond to of 58324

Rocky, <In fact, I believe a shareholder lawsuit could be in the not-too-distant future for IOM. A lawsuit that would immediately call for a 2-1 or 3-1 reverse split.> You own some now....will you join??? Linda

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (43659)	1/16/1998 4:43:00 PM
From: Michael Coley	Respond to of 58324

RE: The Rocky Lawsuit. Rocky rambles on about... >> In fact, I believe a shareholder lawsuit could be in the not-too-distant future for IOM. A lawsuit that would immediately call for a 2-1 or 3-1 reverse split. << Let's just reverse them all. Let's see: 4:3 3:1 2:1 2:1 That's 8:1 overall. We could do a 1:8 reverse split, which would raise the price to $96 and drop the shares to 35 million outstanding. Nah, I think I would rather just wait for it to hit $96 without a reverse split... - Michael Coley - i1.net

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (43659)	1/16/1998 4:50:00 PM
From: Gary Wisdom	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 58324

Forgive me Allen for this --- Rocky, let's see if I understand this: You don't own AOL yet you think it's the greatest stock in the world. You own Iomega but you think it's the worst stock in the world. This is one fantastic investment strategy. Why don't you write a book? How bout this for a title "Exploring my Genius" As for a shareholder lawsuit --- I'm afraid that all the shareholder lawsuit attorneys are busy preparing a case against Syquest. As for MM insulting your imaginary girlfriend -- dating you must be insult enough for any woman, plastic or not. I hope that you don't take this post as a personal attack. Actually, on second thought, who cares if you do.

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (43659)	1/16/1998 4:52:00 PM
From: Kevin D'Espies	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Rock; The ONLY reason AOL went to 93 is because I finally jumped in early today and shorted it. As soon as I cover it will tank.

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (43659)	1/16/1998 5:07:00 PM
From: FuzzFace	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

I notice that the much-loved-by-the-street INTC closed down 1/2. But the despised-by-the-street IOM closed unchanged (down a teenie in after-hours) Much more of that kind of love, and INTC will need a couple million units of penicillin. Rock, how are your 'charts' looking on INTC? Can you see the bottom yet?

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (43659)	1/16/1998 9:44:00 PM
From: John P. Henrie	Respond to of 58324

RE: Dell and AOL AOL and Dell are two stocks that I think will lose favor in 1998. Here is my prediction... YE 1998 Dell $50s AOL $40s . Note: These prices do not reflect any future splits. No models, no number crunching, just a gut feeling. Later, John

To: Rocky Reid who wrote (43659)	1/17/1998 2:46:00 AM
From: KM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

<<In fact, I believe a shareholder lawsuit could be in the not-too-distant future for IOM. A lawsuit that would immediately call for a 2-1 or 3-1 reverse split.>> Hey, it's early Saturday morning and I'm in a great mood! So, Rockman, tell me the relevant federal statutes which you would rely on to seek a reverse split as damages, and the grounds you would allege in your complaint. Would you be seeking class action status? BTW, I'm STILL waiting for that AOL chart read!!!! One other thing - if you're still doing plastic, switch to the real thing. Much better!