SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : OLED Universal Display Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: R. Monte Gu who wrote (20822)11/25/2018 4:26:36 PM
From: I'manoledguy2 Recommendations

Recommended By
brasspenny
Savant

  Respond to of 29657
 
Additionally, LG OLED TVs come with special features and settings to preserve image quality and prevent burn in and image retention. First, there is a Screen Saver feature that will turn on automatically if the TV detects that a static image is displayed on screen after approximately two minutes. There are also three options (available in Menu setting > Picture settings > OLED panel settings) that can be used to preserve image quality. The first of these is the Clear Panel Noise feature that preserves the quality of the image on the display panel by resetting the TV so that it clears the pixels. This feature can be turned on when needed within the settings mentioned above. The second feature that can be employed is the Screen Shift feature which, moves the screen slightly at regular intervals to preserve image quality. A third option is the Logo Luminance Adjustment, which can detect static logos on the screen and reduce brightness to help decrease permanent image retention.



To: R. Monte Gu who wrote (20822)11/25/2018 5:43:35 PM
From: ChicagoBridge7  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29657
 
Your suppositions about "burn-in" and about Samsung make a lot of sense to me. Does anyone out there have any similar thoughts or corroboration/rumors to that effect ? If your suppositions are correct, that would mean that the "burn-in" problem could be corrected if all three (R-G-B) emissive materials had the same degradation rates and longer lifes. Then there would no longer be a need for the topical software solutions that have had negative side effects.

That implies to me that a longer-life phosphorescent blue by UDC could solve the "burn-in" problem. Does that sound right ?