SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ShoppinTheNet who wrote (8223)1/16/1998 7:54:00 PM
From: Doug Meetmer  Respond to of 20681
 
Doug you state "<< I guess the MMs were expecting a lot of insiders to unload today"

Give it up !!! Why would all of these insiders holding options with a strike price of $3 or $4 fight like dogs for years to prove this, put their families financial security at stake, and then right when the have the whole thing proven rush to the the phone to call their brokers to sell at $5 1/2. Wow it ain't going to happen baby!
----------------------------------------------------------
No, you've got it all wrong. I am not saying the insiders are going to
be selling at $ 5 1/2. I am saying I have no way of disproving that
the insiders weren't selling at $8.5 causing the price to fall to
$5 1/2. That is why I wrote to the SEC.

By the way, If you really believe that "they have the whole
thing proven" you should reevaluate your understanding of this
investment. Its a giant leap to go from a sign-off on assays
to a working production model , and obviously I am not the only one who understands that, since the stock is flying like a torn kite. I may
be the only long who will admit it publicly, however.

Have a good weekend, S.K., and get a grip-hopefully this will be a good thing that we are in but none of us really knows that for sure. I
certainly wouldn't bet the farm on it, just the servants quarters.



To: ShoppinTheNet who wrote (8223)1/16/1998 9:15:00 PM
From: jas singh MD  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20681
 
Good evening SK,
<<I guess the MMs wee expecting a lot of insiders to unload today>> I actually made that statement because it was the only reason that I could think of this morning to justify a spread of $1 on a 6 dollar stock. Doug is simply playing the Devils advocate and I for one sincerely appreciate his questions/issues.

Sincerely,

Jas



To: ShoppinTheNet who wrote (8223)1/17/1998 12:14:00 AM
From: Henry Volquardsen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
Gee the stock declines despite the release of certified numbers because of speculation about insiders selling when the trading blackout ends and guess what happens, the stock goes up instead on the infamous day. If I didn't know better I would think that these good folk in possession of inside info actually bought instead. Sure looks that way based on today's action but then I am biased.