Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcher who wrote (144408)	12/3/2018 9:30:18 PM
From: elpolvo	1 Recommendation Recommended By marcher Respond to of 217654

marcher- from mq... men are thousands to 1 smarter than women -- "some men are thousands to one smarter than their britches" ~old ozark saying <sorry. back to reading mode> -ep

To: marcher who wrote (144408)	12/3/2018 11:19:22 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217654

That information is bad. Show me the data. That information didn't even provide the age of the subjects. I guess you know that women turn into adults aka have full grown brains 3 years younger than men. So if that fake testing was done on 18 year olds it's as useless as tits on a bull. Also, the average, median and mean is irrelevant as we're discussing the top 0.0000001%. You are barking up the wrong tree with that information. My 1000 to 1 is just to show the idea. At the total championship level of world champions, to get a woman you'd have more like a million to 1. Admittedly it might be only 100,000. I doubt only 10,000. Hmmm on reflection we could calculate what it must be. Actual testing would be needed to confirm. Mqurice