Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Engine who wrote (1529)	1/16/1998 9:38:00 PM
From: TINKER TAPE	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27968

Very solid Engine. Stick around for awhile, It will be interesting to see what develops. Where are you Cheryl? What are your thoughts on this?

To: Little Engine who wrote (1529)	1/16/1998 10:09:00 PM
From: Terry Lyon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

I am new to this thread but own a fair position in FAMH. I hope that certain people continue to beat up on this stock so I can buy much more for my $$$. Thanks to all the naysayers. My crystal ball doesn't show me much but my gut says BUY and HOLD. So I am very long! Rome wasn't built in a day and this company is just getting off the ground. I really wish to express my thanks to the hard efforts of FAMH management and their staff for you all have accomplished much in a short period of time while shareholders bite their nails. I for one want to know if there is any way that I can contribute to the success of the company. I would be very glad to help management in some rather constructive way. Very loooooooooooong FAMH, Terry Lyon

To: Little Engine who wrote (1529)	1/19/1998 5:41:00 PM
From: Richard V Davis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

Sorry to be so long in responding. My wife came into town Friday and I haven't turned on the computer. I did not comment on FAMH's earnings. I list a true situation; yet you say it is theoretical. Why are your assumptions calculations etc to be taken as fact and anyone else is "theoretical". If you wish to be taken seriouslly by me, at least show that logic works for you. You claim to be unbiased yet a careful reading of your posts show considerable bias. A bit of unsolicited advice: My legal friends tell me that calling FAMH's numbers fals could earn you a trip to court. I personally could not care less if you utter actionable statements but you might at least be aware of such. Rick