SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Financial Collapse of 2001 Unwinding -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: richardred who wrote (1526)12/6/2018 2:45:39 PM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13801
 
This headline refers to an event which already began a few years ago, it's just been changing from cold to hot.
.

Meng’s arrest could plunge US, China into high-tech Cold War - atimes.com

The fallout from the decision to detain the daughter of Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei has rocked markets and left trade war talks hanging by a thread

Meng Wanzhou is the daughter of the man who built China’s high-tech pin-up company Huawei and is considered corporate royalty in the world’s second-largest economy.

But now, the 46-year-old chief financial officer and deputy chairwoman of the flagship firm faces extradition to the United States and a court appearance in Vancouver on Friday after being arrested in Canada over potential violations of US sanctions on Iran.

\

The fallout from the decision has rocked mainland markets and threatened the trade war truce between Washington and Beijing.

After all, her father Ren Zhengfei built the sprawling telecom titan from scratch in the then sleepy fishing town of Shenzhen before it morphed into China’s Silicon Valley.

Exactly 31 years later, Huawei has become the biggest private company in the country with 180,000 employees and a global footprint in more than 100 nations.

Combining a thriving consumer mobile sector with an expanding telecom network business, the conglomerate has also invested heavily in Artificial Intelligence, or AI, Virtual Reality, semiconductors and 5G.

“Huawei will be a top three player in the global communications market 20 years from now,” Ren, 74, a former People’s Liberation Army officer, said back in 1992.

He has since been proved right with revenue projected to hit 655.9 billion yuan (US$102.2 billion) this year, a jump of 9.3% compared to 2017. Last year, the consumer division alone shipped 153 million smartphones with revenue numbers hovering around the 236 billion yuan mark.

But as the group expanded worldwide into the industrial side of the telecoms sector, cracks started to appear. The poster child for the acclaimed “Made in China 2025” blueprint, which has become toxic in Washington, was suddenly being heavily scrutinized by Western governments.

Just hours before it was reported that Meng had been arrested, British Telecom revealed it would be removing Huawei equipment from the core of its 3G and 4G mobile operations in the United Kingdom.

5G infrastructure


BT also stressed that it would block telecom equipment from the company operating in sensitive areas of the UK’s next-generation 5G network.

The announcement followed moves made by Australia and New Zealand to curtail the corporation’s involvement in 5G infrastructure systems because of concerns about possible Chinese government involvement, an allegation that Huawei has denied.

Still, the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission recently issued a report stating that Beijing could force China’s main telecom players to “modify 5G components” for the overseas market.

“[They could be] modified to perform below expectations or fail, facilitate state or corporate espionage, or otherwise compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of networks that used them,” the study highlighted.

Back in February, leading intelligence chiefs from the CIA, FBI and National Security Agency told the US Senate Intelligence Committee they would advise Americans not to use products or services from Huawei and telecom rival ZTE.

“We’re deeply concerned about the risks of allowing any company or entity that is beholden to foreign governments that don’t share our values to gain positions of power inside our telecommunications networks,” Chris Wray, the director of the FBI, told the committee.

“That provides the capacity to exert pressure or control over our telecommunications infrastructure,” he added. “It provides the capacity to maliciously modify or steal information. And it provides the capacity to conduct undetected espionage.”

In a response, ZTE denied the charges while Huawei insisted it “posed no greater cybersecurity risk than any ICT [Information and Communications Technology] vendor.”

Then in April, the US Commerce Department found ZTE had violated a settlement reached in 2017 for breaking sanctions imposed on Iran, which forced the company to shut down most of its operations after being banned from importing US components.

China’s President Xi Jinping was forced to intervene to save ZTE from bankruptcy. Three months later, the company eventually reached a deal with US authorities by paying $1.4 billion in fines, as well as agreeing to overhaul its senior management.

But the damage had been done and the shockwaves rippled across Huawei with US authorities launching a criminal investigation into alleged violations of sanctions on Iran.

Earlier this week, Meng became the first high-profile executive to be caught up in the row.

“The company has been provided very little information regarding the charges and is not aware of any wrongdoing by Ms Meng,” Huawei said in a statement on Thursday.

“The company believes the Canadian and US legal systems will ultimately reach a just conclusion. Huawei complies with all applicable laws and regulations where it operates, including applicable export control and sanction laws and regulations of the UN [United Nations], US and EU [European Union],” it added.

A high-school dropout, Meng stated off as secretary for the group before working her way to the top. Her brother Ren Ping also works for the family business.

But it is unlikely they will end up running the company when their father steps down.

“Huawei’s successor should not only have vision, character and ambition but also a good global perspective and the acumen to drive the company,” Ren said in a letter to employees back in 2013. “My family members do not possess these qualities. Thus, we will never be in the running of the successor race.”

As for the bigger picture, Meng’s arrest threatens to scupper last weekend’s trade war truce.

The state-run Global Times, which is owned by the mouthpiece of China’s Communist Party, the People’s Daily, has warned that there will be repercussions in a short statement on Twitter.

“China should be fully prepared for an escalation in the #tradewar with the US, as the US will not ease its stance on China, and the recent arrest of the senior executive of #Huawei is a vivid example,” the tweet, which had opposing fists with Chinese and US flags superimposed upon them, said.

Yet the Foreign Ministry went even further in a prepared statement:

“We have made solemn representations to Canada and the US, demanding that both parties immediately clarify the reasons for the detention, and immediately release the detainee to protect the person’s legal rights.”

Nervous markets reacted quickly to the news with a sell-off in the technology sector reflecting a broader downturn.

In Shanghai, the composite index slipped 1.68% while Shenzhen dropped 2.17% and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng tumbled 2.47%. Elsewhere, Japan’s Nikkei 225 fell 1.91% while South Korea’s Kospi closed down 1.55%.

“The investigation of Huawei could be a prelude to further action against the firm and its senior officials,” analysis from the Eurasia Group said.

For Meng, it could be the start of an extradition nightmare which could end up plunging China and the US into a technological Cold War.



To: richardred who wrote (1526)12/7/2018 12:30:38 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13801
 
How the Japanese reacted when their firms broke rules. Young people do not have a memory of how things were during the Cold War.

They do not know what the CoCom was.

More Japanese firms accused of prohibited sales to Soviets

By STEWART SLAVIN

TOKYO -- The government filed a complaint Wednesday against a Japanese air conditioner maker and a trading company for allegedly selling a chemical solution to the Soviet Union that could be used to stabilize the course of guided missiles.

The Ministry of International Trade and Industry, or MITI, accused the Osaka-based Daikin Industries Ltd. and Tokyo's Boeki Ltd., an exporter, of violating an international ban on exports of military related technology to communist countries.

It would mark Japan's third major violation in two years of the prohibitions on such exports.

Police in the western city of Osaka began searching the offices of the two companies Wednesday morning.

The two firms were accused of exporting to the Soviet Union 860 tons of a concentrated solution of halogenated hydrocarbon, worth 400 million yen ($3.3 million), on 17 occasions between February 1986 and May 1987.

The ministry said the chemical, used in Japan as a washing agent in semiconductor production, also can be employed to extinguish fires at chemical plants, or as a coolant to stabilize the course of guided missiles.

Ministry officials said it was the third major violation by Japanese firms in the past two years of rules established by the Coordinating Council on Multilateral Export Controls, or COCOM. The council, based in Paris, is a watchdog group of 16 Western nations charged with regulating exports to communist countries of equipment that could be used for military purposes.

Last year, a subsidiary of the Japanese electronics giant Toshiba Corp. was found guilty of selling sophisticated milling machinery to the Soviet Union.
See article here: https://projectalpha.eu/the-toshiba-kongsberg-case/
The equipment enabled the Soviets to build super-quiet submarine propellers, according to U.S. defense officials.

The Toshiba incident so angered the U.S. Congress that it issued a ban against the sale of Toshiba products in the United States under the new trade bill.

In a similar case this year, a Tokyo court fined two Japanese trading companies in October for selling computerized sensing devices to China. Defense experts said the devices could be used to detect submarine movements and monitor nuclear tests.

The English-language Daily Yomiuri newspaper said Wednesday the trade ministry acted quickly in the latest case so that the investigation would not coincide with this month's visit to Japan by Soviet Foreign Ministry Eduard Shevardnadze, scheduled to begin Dec. 19.

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram for more UPI news and photos.

Read more: upi.com



To: richardred who wrote (1526)12/7/2018 10:17:49 AM
From: richardred  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13801
 
2 Companies Pay Penalties For Improving China Rockets

By JEFF GERTHMARCH 6, 2003


Two leading American aerospace companies have agreed to pay a record $32 million in penalties to settle civil charges that they unlawfully transferred rocket and satellite data to China in the 1990's.

The agreement, which was completed on Tuesday and released today, comes two months after the State Department accused the companies, Hughes Electronics Corporation, a unit of General Motors, and Boeing Satellite Systems of 123 violations of export laws in connection with the Chinese data transfers. In a joint statement the companies said they 'express regret for not having obtained licenses that should have been obtained' in the 1990's by a Hughes unit, the Hughes Space and Communications Company, which was acquired in 2000 by Boeing.

The companies also said they 'acknowledge the nature and seriousness of the offenses charged by the Department of State, including the harm such offenses could cause to the security and foreign policy interests of the United States.'

Under the agreement the companies will pay $20 million to the federal government over the next seven years, invest another $8 million to increase their export compliance programs and receive a $4 million credit for past export enhancement programs. Officials said the $32 million civil penalty is the largest in an arms export case.

The technology used to launch civilian rockets and satellites is similar to that used to launch missiles so there are tight curbs -- mostly administered by the State Department -- on the export of satellites, aerospace equipment and related defense services.

The Chinese have always insisted that their rocket and missile programs did not need help from American companies. But a string of Chinese rocket failures in the 1990's ended only after American companies transferred data on guidance systems, telemetry, aerodynamics, and rocket failures.

In 1998 a Congressional panel criticized satellite manufacturers for sometimes subordinating national security to the financial considerations and concluded that their 'illegally transmitted' information had improved the reliability of China's civilian and military rockets.

The next year the United States stopped permitting the launch of American satellites on Chinese rockets as concerns rose about Chinese aid to missile programs in North Korea and Pakistan.

China agreed in November 2000 not to assist other countries in developing ballistic missiles that could deliver nuclear weapons. But the Central Intelligence Agency told Congress earlier this year that Chinese companies have continued to provide 'missile-related items, raw materials and/or assistance' to North Korea and several other 'countries of proliferation concern.'

The settlement ends a five-year federal investigation into how American satellite and aerospace companies aided China as they competed to have their satellites launched aboard Chinese rockets. The assistance went to Chinese individuals as well as Chinese-related companies and organizations, some private and some governmental.

Previously the Lockheed Martin Corporation and Loral Space and Communications Corporation agreed to pay fines -- $13 million and $20 million respectively -- to settle similar cases. The Justice Department terminated its criminal investigation of Hughes and Loral last year without taking any action.

The settlement announced today also calls for the companies to appoint a separate third party to monitor the agreement as well as future exports to countries such as China.

The latest agreement seems to disavow previous denials of wrongdoing by Hughes because it states that its 'regret for not having obtained licenses that should have been obtained' was 'notwithstanding Hughes' prior public comments to the contrary.'

The heads of the 1998 Congressional committee that investigated the data transfers to China, Representative Christopher Cox, a California Republican, and Representative Norm Dicks, a Democrat from Washington, issued a statement today praising the penalty as well as the corporate pledges of remedial action.

'This steep fine and sobering result is another reminder that effectively preventing weapons proliferation requires vigilant enforcement of export controls on military technology,' the statement said.

The government's negotiations with Boeing and Hughes stalled, leading the State Department to file the civil equivalent of an indictment last December spelling out the 123 charges.

The charges included three separate cases in which officials from the former Hughes unit helped Chinese-related entities determine what went wrong on failed satellite launchings.

nytimes.com

P.S. Message 31864181