SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: robert b furman who wrote (61509)12/6/2018 11:08:59 AM
From: Ditchdigger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78743
 
I'd expect those dairy cows kicking your farmers ass more than soy beans.
Dairy farmers have been and continue suffering here, have been for years.
But the good state of Vermont (and my taxes) keep them afloat, barely.
Many need to go out of business(supply and demand). Years ago the government stepped in and bought out a number of herds. Dairy farmers are a protected class in VT..I blame it on those socialist progressive bastards, Ben and Jerry! (there's my political rant(g))

Some have begun planting panels on solar farms (g)

Any opinions on PCAR, nice divy announcement the other day



To: robert b furman who wrote (61509)12/6/2018 7:53:02 PM
From: Spekulatius1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Lance Bredvold

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78743
 
Hello, just interested what this $1.68 subsidy refers too ( per bushel?). Right now, soybean sells for ~$9/bushel, which means that the farmer in your case for a ~17% subsidy. We often hear about unfair trade and to some extend it is. I do think what is happening though is that for agricultural goods the US subsidizes the supply side and enables exports that otherwise wouldn’t not be economic, yet we complain about other countries unfair trade practices in the same sector. In a sense, we actually subsidize the Chinese when we subsidize soybeans that end up being consumed in China with taxpayers money.