SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Seagrove who wrote (1103975)12/10/2018 11:58:23 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 1579927
 
" The projection of a 10-percent hit to GDP is an extremely unlikely"

Could be worse.



To: James Seagrove who wrote (1103975)12/11/2018 12:35:50 AM
From: bruwin1 Recommendation

Recommended By
James Seagrove

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579927
 
And not to mention Michael Mann, the self-styled 'Climate Scientist' (really a plain Geologist) and his "invention(?)" of a new climate history with his dodgy 'Hockey Stick'.... As has been shown up as a load of CRAP by Mark Steyn in the following .....




To: James Seagrove who wrote (1103975)12/11/2018 1:07:59 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579927
 
James, quoting the "climate change" report:
All told, the report says, climate change could slash up to a tenth of gross domestic product by 2100, more than double the losses of the Great Recession a decade ago.
How much devastation did World War II cause? It was probably a hundred times worse than that of the Great Recession.

If "climate change" is only predicted to create double the losses of the Great Recession over the course of the next 80 years, then that is an insignificant drag on the global economy.

Tenchusatsu